Title:
Luminaura
Medium and Dimensions: 8” x 8” x 15”;
Plexiglas domes lined with adhesive plastic and permanent ink
coloring, set atop a semi-parabolic lamp base and 40 watt light
bulb.
Legend:
Normal sequence: Thymine – Yellow,
Adenine – Red, Guanine – Orange, Cytosine –
Blue, unidentified base (# 86) – Black
Mutated sequence: Thymine – Green,
Adenine – Red, Guanine – Yellow, Cytosine –
Blue, unidentified base (# 86) – Green
|
Statement:
In the past decade, the rise of biotechnology
has evolved our concept of DNA from a promising enigma of nature,
to the infallible “code of life” that can be mastered
and read like words in an extensive operator’s manual. We
have lost touch with the biological aspect of DNA – all the
life and organisms it conducts, the patterns of number abounding
in nature, the subtle similarities between species – in our
quest to “decode” this vital molecule and to access
Nature’s database. In a similar fashion, we have grown increasingly
dependent on the answers and cures being in our genes, hoping that
nature trumps nurture in changing our futures. I wanted to explore
the natural phenomena of DNA, getting away from the sterile laboratory
mindset and observing the mystifying subtleties of DNA’s role
in nature. I also wanted to incorporate the nature-nurture issue,
emphasizing the importance of social factors in empirical arenas
such as science, economics, etc.
I chose light and projection as the medium
in order to capture the effect of the environment on the sequence’s
appearance, or phenotype. With this medium, I could also order the
bases according to some natural number pattern or shape, thus incorporating
the natural phenomena concept. After exhausting the Fibonacci Sequence,
I decided to use butterfly wings as the pattern for the 100 base
sample sequence, as this shape naturally occurs in financial analysis
(“butterfly charts”), population growth patterns, and
of course the animal kingdom. In addition, butterfly wings are only
one cell layer thick, each cell being a pigmented scale on a fragile
framework; thus I could compose the winged pattern on my artwork
so that one colored outlet of light represents one base of the sequence.
I drafted the sequence along the horizontals that make up the wing
pattern (as seen on the concept sketches) so that both wings are
symmetrical with 200 bases in total. I grafted the pattern onto
one of the Plexiglas domes, and the mutated sequence on the opposing
dome. Once joined and placed on the lamp base, the light shines
through the globe and projects each sequence on opposite walls –
objects or surface textures affect the appearance of the winged
image, simulating the environment’s effects on genotype.
Since the basic structure and medium were
my primary inspirations, my project hinged on fitting the representation
to this globe-light structure. Difficulty came with finding a pattern
that would be feasible to inscribe on a globe, which then depended
on the material from which globe was constructed. Fibonnacci patterns
and other hexagonal DNA data sets that I researched proved ineffective
for the Plexiglas and hand-drilling method I had settled for, so
I turned to butterfly wings. This pattern mandated more creativity
in ordering the bases than I had anticipated, which later became
useful in mutating the sequence. Upon completion, the image projected
was much smaller than I had conceptualized, and this dampens the
effect of the work in my opinion. With a larger time and financial
budget, however, I could alter the lamp base and the corresponding
portion of the globe to enhance the projection. If I were able to
use a spiral Fibonacci sequence, combining both the mutated and
the normal sequences into one contravening spiral, the projection
would be perfect yet a different material would be needed for the
globe – this was another frustration with the limitations
of the sequence as preexisting structure. Overall, however, the
artwork still conveys my original intent, albeit on a more compact
scale.
|