http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/micro/gallery/dna/dna.html
Liquid crystal images of DNA are even more beautiful to me than
its helical chemical structure. There are liquid crystal images
of amino acids and a variety of other compounds as well. This link
was my favorite.
http://www.uct.ac.za/depts/mmi/stannard/emimages.html
Encoded by the smallest genomes, these viruses still have elaborate
patterns of repeating protein subunits. Some are enclosed by a helical
structure, while others have an icosahedral conformation.
http://www.ladyslipper.com/paphhyb.htm
I was amazed at the different variety of ladyslippers. Maybe someone
has already found a way to breed blue roses. I searched for a site
with blue roses, but it seems like no one has accomplished making
one yet.
http://www.naturallist.com/fungipoi.htm
Mushrooms are quite beautiful, especially when they are poisonous.
A recurring theme in nature is to use bright colors as warning signs
to predators that something is poisonous. This is evident in mushrooms.
http://www.wowwee.com/biobugs/biointerface.html#
Toy bugs with artificial intelligence? As a child, I thought Spell-It
was a cool toy. The toy industry shows promise as a good place for
science and art to come together.
http://www.chemsoc.org/viselements/pages/page3.html
This guy visualized every element in the periodic table. They are
very beautiful digital images. Often scientists have to create an
image for something they can't see, or don't know about.
http://www.uq.edu.au/nanoworld/images_1.html
Electron microscopy should be the next media for artists because
you can take a picture of anything, even a fruit fly, and it will
look cool. (although I think it's pretty expensive and many labs
don't even have access to electron microscopes) http://www.debutart.com/DnA/dna.htm
I couldn't see the direct connection of DNA to these images, but
there was something familiar about each image. I couldn't put my
finger on it.
http://www.lhham.com.sg/poems/dna.html
This was the first poem I ever read on DNA. It shows uncertainty
and criticism for the future of genetics.
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/micro/gallery/dna/dna.html
Liquid crystal images of DNA are even more beautiful to me than
its helical chemical structure.
http://www.chemicalgraphics.com/paul/DNA.html#
Outdoors I think the artist did a good job of taking DNA out of
its ordinary context and present it in a creative way.
http://conform.suffocate.org/
This site is an electrical version of the game telephone. An image
is sent to a person, in which the person can add or take out different
aspects of the original image. Then the image is passed to another
person. The series goes on to include a total of 20 different images.
This project illustrates how one idea can be altered into various
different representations depending on the person's choice of change.
http://www-psych.nmsu.edu/~vic/faceprints/
This link is quite interesting. A male's face can be morphed into
a female's face at a slow changing rate, which is controlled by
the participant. Different commands are asked, such as, find the
healthiest or most attractive looking female. This link illustrates
how everyone has a different perception for certain aspects of the
human facial form.
http://snaffle.users.netlink.co.uk/form/evolutio.html
I like this page because it expands on the concept of art. It directly
answers three questions. What is Evolutionary, Genetic, and Organic
art? This site gives me a better understanding between the differences
and similarities of evolutionary, genetic, and organic art.
http://gs2.sp.cs.cmu.edu/art/random/howto/index.html
This site combines art and mathematical science. Mathematical formulas
are generated by the computer and a related picture is drawn representing
the formula. The formulas are random, but as they get more complicated,
the pictures that are generated become more elaborate.
http://www.ransen.com/Articles/GenArt.htm
Color scheme plays an important role with the presentation of the
image. This site shows how changing colors of any particular design
or image can affect the overall appearance of the design. Toward
the end of the page, there is a section that pertains to breeding
images where it combines a "mother" and "father" image to form to
produce a "child."
http://arttech.about.com/library/weekly/aa031401a.htm
This site brings up a question that drew me to it; "was his glowing
rabbit art or abuse of science?" The question pertains to Eduardo
Kac's glowing rabbit which resulted from his work with scientists.
This site touches more on the combination of artist and scientists.
http://www.unm.edu/~dehart/intro2000/2000images/mixed%20media/physical%203.html
The human form with the emphasis of bones are presented as an
art form by Dennis L. DeHart. He uses several different combinations
of mediums to create his artwork such as wood, glass, halogen and
fluorescent lights. His images look like as if they are images in
a hospital or health clinic.
http://www.iamstatic.com/signal.html
This opening page of this site presents an interesting looking tomato.
The tomato reminded me of the imprinted tomato that was shown during
class; however in this case, the image on the tomato has actual
looking teeth. This effect gives a sense of life to the tomato.
http://www.hyperart.com/
The images that are comprised on the site are interesting and vivid.
They represent a "hyperreal world; it's a world of substituting
elements of the real for the real." The images are impressive, but
they give off an eerie feeling.
http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/groups/mml/projects/ArtGallery/Worlds_E.html
All of the art work are made specifically by two artists "who have
created, transformed or painted their pictures on the computer only."
The pictures are categorized into worlds in the Computer Art Gallery.
The worlds contain pictures that are themed to portray different
senses to the visitor. The effects that the pictures give are remarkable
because there is a soothing sense to the particular world.
http://alife.fusebox.com/morph_lab.html
This was really fun to play with. An interesting feature on the
site was also the description of how it works. It described what
genes worked in it and how and talked about the genotypes and phenotypes
which is what I like to learn about in my science classes.
http://www.huxtable.com/java/art.html
Another site where you can make genetic art. Used a genetic algorithm
to create art. After I made a piece of art, it was cool to click
the ³tree² button to see what had been done.
http://www.cambrianart.com/
This program was really fun. It was called evolutionary art and
genetic programming. What I liked about it was that it was visually
attractive and, even better, interactive!
http://www.geneart.org/offerings.htm
The pieces of art concerning genetics on this page were really interesting.
Some of my favorites were Frank Mooreıs ³Beacon,² which was beautiful,
especially considering his history, and Sidney Harrisı ³Seven Humorous
Insights.² This was my favorite of the two because of the ideas
that it brought to my attention.
http://www.geneart.org/laverdiere.htm
The statement at the end of this was interesting. It said that you
will be able to grow genious will be grown on trees and can be ordered.
An interesting concept, but seems too unrealistic and pescimistic.
http://home.pacbell.net/s-max/scott/simevol.html
This site was not very high-tech, however the idea of showing the
evolution of these bugs was interesting.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/genome/
This is an interesting history of the cracking of the genetic code.
The cool parts were the discussions of the ethics of manipulating
genes.
http://www.geneart.org/rubenstein.htm
This cute kid first caught my attention. The idea of being able
to design or mutate new living beings is a very cool concept. I
know that some may see it as a problem, but I donıt see how it can
hurt anything if that is what one truly desires.
http://www.geneart.org/miller-steve.htm
This portrait of a person does not seem to be a person at all. It
raises the question of whether we are simply our genes, however,
that is no replacement for our outward appearance.
http://praystation.com
(talk about in class) -although this is more of a web-art site,
it has some pieces pertaining to genetics and its use in art. -inspired
from bacteria mentions in his monthly calendar a lecture reguarding
genetics and art -i tried emailing him reguarding this subject but
he never replyed to my question
http://geneact.com
-basic overview of genomic art and links -topics pertaining to genomic
art -easy to navigate through
http://scit.wlv.ac.uk/events/latham.html
-human creativity and generation of power through computing
-engineering programming - a bit dry...did not hold my interest
really
http://artworks.co.uk/index2.htm
-included work of several interesting artists, including computer
art, computer programming, video games, and organic art -attaches
several links that are worthy of viewers time -easy to navigate;
simple and efficient site
http://go.to/organicart/
-has really great images of art that was inspired by organic
science -beautiful images -expanded computer artwork; detailed
http://snaffle.users.netlink.co.uk/form/evolutio.html
(i would like to talk about this one in class) -excellent description/definition
of evolutionary art, genetic art, and organic art -contemporary
artform -computer-generated art -mutations of originals -clear,
concise, and easy to navigate
http://web.ukonline.co.uk/darrenf/dream.htm
-beautiful images by artist Darren Fisher, a "computer artist" who
is inspired by science -really great DNA image called: "Fractal
DNA Creatures Contemplate War on Mankind"
http://www,wizardnet.com/musgrave/mutatis.html
-Ken Musgrave created a program called "Dr. Mutatis" to program
genetic images, mostly sexual reproduction that can be seen in a
subliminal manner, through the use of computers -genetic programming.
http://www.t0.or.at/msguide/ai/genart.htm
-genetic algorithms-usinf literature, pictures, sound, and movies
-has great selection of different &disperse examples -option of
interactive genetic art -ex: "The Tierra Project"
http://artech.about.com/cs/biologicalart/
-electronic art -artists as cultural detectives -communication -beauty
inspired from nature -simple to navigate -a little boring though
-photography & genetic memory as art -alogorithms
http://www.icp.org/exhibitions/foreign_body/fb_press_release.html.
-very interesting and brief -reading about the future & human cloning
-mutations= fantastical human creatures -"Imaging the Future" seems
to be a really great show -photography + realizqtion =intersection
of science, technology, and photography http://molecularmusic.com/
(talk about in class) -biochemists/musicians working to generate
music from proteins -Dr.Linda Long- musician; 5 years in te works
of molecular music &music therapy -simple site..not really elaborate/informative
-provokes my interest, however
http://www.whozoo.org/mac/music/sources.htm
-genes and music -kind of boring but informative -lots of info and
links -music from DNA/Protein math
http://www.algoart.com/dnamusic/ (share w/ class) -interesting
b/c you can hear samples of protein sequences! -nice for the ears
and gives a good idea of what molecular music is all about -eerie
sounding but pretty amazing
http://www.ekac.org/transgenic.html
-mutate our perception of human body to an artificially controlled
and electronically transformed object -very interesting -seen throughout
human history -DNA, cells, mutations -dense
http://www.aec.at/lifescience/magazine/art/kac.htm/
-again by Prof. Kac--very informative -social impact of computer
technology, biotechnologies, and genetic engineering -"transforming
forever how society approaches the notion of life." -social, political,
ethical issues
http://www.genochoice.com/
(show to class) -SCARY SITE!!!! -create your own genetically healthy
child online! -using DNA to locate "bad" genes -this can't be for
real???!!! (I hope NOT)
http://www.duke.edu/`giftwrap/kac.html
-interesting to see what other universities are involved with this
field -art, ethics, & genetic engineering -deals w/ artist Eduardo
Kac -GFP bunny -"transgenic" http://www.telebody.ws/telekroker.htm
-altered human figure in digital world -essay by Steve Gibbon; interesting
-artifical-life, transgenic body -telebody is his show about a "digital"
transfomer of bio-genetic flesh
http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Cultural/Art/index-2.html#EVOL
-transhumanities -individual growth -films and documentaries -evolutionary
and organic art -contains a great many links
http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/
I like how the artist decided to take a picture of a normal cell
and have the genetic material come out to you.
http://gslc.genetics.utah.edu/students.html
I like the picture in the corner representing the organization.
its very eye appealing
http://www.dnaftb.org/dnaftb/12/concept/index.html
This reminds my of Dolly the sheep!!!
http://www.dnaftb.org/dnaftb/19/concept/index.html
These are pictures of James watson. i have read his book the double
helix.
http://www.dnaftb.org/dnaftb/18/concept/index.html
Learning about phages made DNA really interesting for me.
http://www.dnaftb.org/dnaftb/20/concept/index.html
I like the radiation warning sign. it makes me wonder what consequences
likes ahead when we play with DNA.
http://www.dnaftb.org/dnaftb/34/concept/index.html
Perhaps this picture is trying to tell us the idea of cross breeding
a human and frog my favorite one
http://www.dnaftb.org/dnaftb/40/concept/index.html
I always learned about fruit flies with DNA
http://www.dnaftb.org/dnaftb/39/concept/index.htm
The art is fascinating with the idea of DNA is all around us.
http://www.dnaftb.org/dnaftb/36/concept/index.html
This is a really cool representation of DNA being interacted with
other molecules.
http://www.henryart.org/gene-sis/splash.html
- Exhibition that of several artists work created in response to
recent development in human genomics.
www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/%7Epv28/
Interesting digital media installations. Some of them relates to
genomics.
http://www.thestranger.com/2000-09-28/art2.html
People do anything these days. Sculpture made of urine collected
from artists of the contry. I wouldn't mind to see it. No pictures,
sorry!
http://www.margigeerlinks.com
Have a look at this one. It maybe interesting to show it in class.
It's eery
http://www.dse.nl/fabriek/project/96/F_FELD_E_HOVEN/Margi_Geerlinks.html
This one complements the previous. The image is very interesting.
No commentary needed.
http://www.jaqbox.com/JC/2001ptgs.html
Commentary on both the visual culture and everyday practice of scientific
investigation by highlighting similarities between artistic and
scientific practice.
http://www.sfcamerawork.org/past_exhibits/Flesh.html
http://www.kala.org/sparks1.html
http://www.sfcamerawork.org/past_exhibits/Flesh.html
FLESH
Jeanne Friscia o Jenny Rosenberg o Heather Sparks o Tina Wolfe (need
to get back to them) Sparks's Tom's Twister was a four-foot high
laminate sheet with enlarged and digitally imprinted scans of her
hair and skin samples, by Heather Sparks. The laminate curled, spiral
and natural, allowing the material to dictate its own form. The
translucent scans, genetic references horizontally striated in vertical
bands, referenced certain individual characteristics which cumulatively
revealed a digitized self-portrait of the artist.
http://www.massurrealism.com/gal.htm
Today I was thinking that the discussion of genetics and art had
to include the work of the surrealists, but I didn't want to resource
to the same ones than always (Dali, Magritte, De Chirico). Then
I found her: Melissa Szalkowski
http://www.studio-visit.com/December1999/progressreport1.html
This artist, Jeff Wyckoff, uses his experiences in the scientific
field to create art. I don't fully understand some of his work.
I'm most intrigued by the images of the faces on a liquid infected
by bacteria.
http://www.molec.com/biology/notes/mini-circles/macmode.html
DNA makes kinks in front of your eyes. Actually the scientists
had to change the ions in the solution (from magnesium and chloride,
to zinc and bromide). Then with probe microscopy the before and
after are seen. Both remind me of volcanoes I got to fly over in
Hawaii. Maybe this is some kind of thermal image technique.
http://spm.phy.bris.ac.uk/
then click on MOVIES on the left sidebar There are some amazing
images of scanning probe microscopy, which I had never heard of
before. There is also a cool one of a human chromosome! It's at
prophase, in the X shape. I couldn't get the movie to download though
so I don't know if it goes through mitosis or if there are different
angles. Other ideas:
http://www.foresight.org/Nanomedicine/Gallery/Visitors/Jones1.html
A three-dimensional picture representing the new field of nanobiotechnology.
The artist says the blue and white on the bottom is supposed to
be a branching fungus. I think this piece is showing the methods
of math (on the cube), molecules in different forms, and a real
organism against a surreal landscape. The simplicity and the wide
range of colors attracted me to the art.
http://www.spe.sony.com/Pictures/SonyMovies/movies/Gattaca/design_child.htm
I like this genetics game better than the genochoice site. Here
you "design a child" and I played with the option "roll the genetic
dice". So after entering my characteristics and family history and
those of a guy (I didn't make him perfect) here are the results.
They asked me again if I wanted to change my mind and engineer the
child. I would never want to make a designer child. Considering
my chance for a genetic "disease", my parents might not have had
me. (Watch the "Coda" on Deleted Scenes of the GATTACA DVD.) However
my boy/girl was "lucky" and didn't get many of the diseases. EYE
COLOR: Brown SHORTSIGHTEDNESS:20/50 STATURE:5'4'' to 5' 8'' LONGEVITY:80-90
SPEED:13-10 secs. SEXUAL ORIENTATION:HETEROSEXUAL DEXTRECITY:RIGHT
HANDED ADDICTIVE SUSCEPTIBILITIES: sibling
http://www.eldian.com/chaoslab/ChaoslabGallery.html
This is a pure art site with a ton of cool fractals on it. However
links to the rest of the "chaoslab" are pretty interesting as well,
with games, art, and science all combined. The bouncy ball page
alone is entertaining, although it has nothing to do with this class.
http://www.aklein.homestead.com/files/radiant_logic.htm
Where does logic go? Do we learn from ourselves, or more importantly,
from mistakes in history? "Radiant Logic" suggests that our minds
are like this giant flowchart that end up branching in some directions,
reaching an endpoint, and being circular in some parts. Also the
symmetry of this piece is pleasing to look at. Genetically and subconsciously,
humans prefer symmetry in other people so I guess here it works
for the art too.
http://www.loni.ucla.edu/SVG/Images/ImageSet1.html
"Composite variability elipsoids of 20 normal subjects" comes
from the UCLA Lab of Neural Imaging. It is a picture of one brain
with 20 sets of data superimposed so that the colors come out in
a spectrum. They range from highly varied areas (personality areas)
to less varied areas (low level functions). The use of color is
amazing but it all comes from inside real people.
http://news.lycos.com/news/story.asp?n_2=1§ion=MyLycos&pitem=HEALTH
Here
is a news blurb from my homepage talking about the president of
Celera's (company that sequenced the human genome) resignation.
Celera wants to manufacture drugs based on their knowledge of the
genetic code. This shows the corporate aspect of biotechnology.
http://www.ChemicalGraphics.com/PovChem/ Another chemical drawing
program I found. This one works for Windows and Mac and specializes
in DNA. I'll see if it has the capability of creating, but I know
it can load saved DNAs that the program supplies.
http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/genomics/4_changing/atwork.html
A picture of one of these microarrays was in one of my biology textbooks.
In reality they are microscopic but at the museum the display fills
up a room. The microarray can compare thousands of genes at once
by displaying which are expressed actively and which are not. Expressiveness
is determined by mRNA (converts genes to proteins) that was isolated
by nucleotide probes. Then the mRNA is different colors on the microarray
and is scanned by a computer to compare all the genes.
http://www.asci.org/
-This website is for public users to allow them to obtain the knowledge
of how artists and scientists use technology in their work -It allows
artists and scientists to come together to collaborate their knowledge
to create a new work of art/science -There are research links, as
well as information from the ArtSci2001 Symposium.
http://www.exploratorium.edu/
-This museum is very interesting. I felt that this museum meshed
art and science very well. -When I went to visit this museum, it
was entertaining and there were many interactive technologies which
can be easily seen as a work of art. -The interactivity of the museum
was very different from normal museums and I enjoyed it thoroughly
and felt it was relevant of the art/science idea, which was why
I included this link.
http://www.gamasutra.com/
-One of the biggest technologies at this point in time is video
games. Video games are excellent examples of a art/science collaboration
and the result of it. -This website has up-to-date information on
current video games as well as conference information for those
that are interested in learning about video games. -There are latest
news and featured games. I found this website very interesting and
is not necessarily "genetic" but it does involve both art and science,
which is making a big splash in the public eye these days.
http://www.brantacan.co.uk/bridges.htm
-Bridges are seen as only beautiful works of architecture. However,
this website indicates that bridges involve delicate planning of
how it must be built so that it is sturdy and in doing so, one uses
science to determine this matter. -Bridges are an excellent example
of beautiful works of art yet have such detailed science involved.
-This website shows many examples of different bridges and the scientific
rules involved in building a bridge.
http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/genomics/6_dna/index.html
SKIP what's on the pagego straight to the "Future Survey" middle
of page, right hand side. Take the poll, you'll be surprised at
some of the answers!!! They asked questions about confidentiality
and more. REALLY INTERESTING when they show other people's responses.
------
http://research.amnh.org/programs/genomelab/
Although I wasn't able to enjoy the full effect of this site, I
liked what they had done. If you visit their museum, you can sequence
your own DNA, then you return to this site and enter your sequence
ID that was issued and they do some cool things with YOUR genes
(with cytochrome B, evolution etc.) --------
http://www.tca.uwa.edu.au/ol/olMainFrames.html
These people think semi-living things are the tool of the futureso
they are kinda like AZIZ and the other guy, BUT they actually make
the things. So thought the Aziz group was cool, but I like these
guys more because they construct 3-D versions of the pictures they
takethis one was an eye retractor ----------
http://www.tca.uwa.edu.au/ars/arsMainFrames.html
this was really funny and a bit eerie at the same timethey make
"worry dolls" out of genetically grown materialeither cells, or
biodegradable polymersthey have a face and everything --------------
http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/gallery/gallery314/rapoport.htm
l look at the "Arbor Erecta" pieceI found it wittyalso a subtle
point she does not make is the idea of us eating plants and their
genome, incorporate those chemicals into our genome and one day
giving it back to them when we die and are put into the ground.
----------
http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/gallery/gallery314/anker.html
VERY VERY VERY nice!!! if you skipped everything, read this one
please! I was blown away by the assertion the artist/author madeI
never thought about this!!!! --
http://www.jmvanwyhe.freeserve.co.uk/image_links.html
this is about Phrenology I do research in a field (Neurology) that
was founded in part on this notion Ruth mentioned the quote about
"Holmes' forehead" this is what she was talking about.
http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/gallery/gallery314/potter.html
I got something different than what the artist explained to me this
piece is about preserving like the Jurassic park idea I also wonder
if nature means for things like this (or when a man is found frozen
after 100s of years) to happen? -------------
http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/gallery/gallery314/wight.html
I was not so much impressed with the artwork itself, but more with
what he had to say it reminded me again that IF we can control our
genes would we start getting bored with the perfect height, weight,
hair color and start adding other features (like the ones mentioned
in this piece)? wouldn't we be making mutants would there be an
end? --------------
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/visible
/visible_human.html this was emailed to me by Ruth it's interesting
I'm not sure if it's the same one I had read before (they were vague
with the origin of it)a few years ago (about 5 or 6) a male prisoner
sentenced to death wanted to make up for his criminal life and offered
his body to science in a special way! I can talk about this in class
if anybody is interested...cool story
http://www.ornl.gov/hgmis/
http://www.er.doe.gov/production/ober/hug_top.html
http://mendel.berkeley.edu/dog.html
http://gdbwww.gdb.org/
http://arttech.about.com/cs/biologicalart/
http://www2.mc.maricopa.edu/anthro/origins/asm97.html
http://www.geneletter.org/10-02-00/features/artandgenetics.html
http://www.science-art.com/
http://www.scienceartco.com/
http://www.artscatalyst.org/
http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,44446,00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1567000/1567039.stm
http://www.physci.ucla.edu/html/arnold.htm
http://128.32.209.193/shawn/art.page.chimera.html
http://www.geneart.org/
http://members.tripod.com/vismath7/proceedings/brodyk.htm
http://www.ucsc.edu/research/genome_forum/exhibit.html
http://www.amnh.org/science/genomics/
http://www.calarts.edu/~biotech/
http://www.artadn.com/fr/index-fr.html
Genetic
Supermarkets: The theme of these websites is the different ways
we make it easy to design our perfect babies. Though our true genetic
make-up has not been completely mapped, we have developed many methods
of determining the heritability of certain diseases and illnesses.
By recording these traits and eliminating the chances of inheriting
them, we are able to design more flawless children. As easy as we
can select for eye color and height, we will be able to find and
correct the errors in each of our genome. Imagine taking one of
your germ cells, cleaning all errors, and through in vitro fertilization,
creating perfect children with your spouse.
http://www.cryos.dk/screening.asp
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/OntheEighthDay.html
http://newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/bio99/bio99016.htm
Eugenics
and prometheism: "an effort to breed better human beings by encouraging
the reproduction of people with "good" genes and discouraging those
with "bad" genes." Another quote: "The danger of curing the effects
of genetic disease through postnatal intervention, and the accumulation
of bad genes, is equivalent to allowing toxins to build up in the
environment and curing them with vitamin supplements. Resources
must not be wasted on curing disease when it is more cost effective
to merely eliminate the disease from the genetic capital of the
eugenic nation. We can easily live with numerous minor genetic flaws,
but it should never be policy to correct obviously adverse genetic
diseases when they can be detected and eliminated from the gene
pool, even though that is not our primary goal." Sites which talk
about the history, practices, and ethics of genetic screening. Because
much of the data came from the 19001s in America, there is an obvious
bias and prejudice of other cultures:
http://www.eugenicsarchive.org
http://www.eugenics.net/papers/mission.html
- Argues that there is a need for the human race to create populations
of more and more intelligent people because civilization is only
advanced through key intelligent humans. However, they believe that
the gene pool is becoming "polluted" due to the fact that more unintelligent
people have greater numbers of children than intelligent.
http://www.prometheism.net/
- Wow. The need to breed intelligence at what ever the cost. Talks
about how sex, reproduction (breeding), and family are three different
things and should be kept separate. Strange religion, but interesting.
http://anzwers.org/free/chimaera/island.html
- prometheism and a deserted island; the ability to breed intelligent
communities in peace. 3. Hedonistic Imparitive through genetic
technology and nanotechnology, we will be able to alter our mental
states just like manipulating diseased genes. Imagine ending depression
and predispositions in people for "mental pain" receptors. "Over
the next thousand years or so, the biological substrates of suffering
will be eradicated completely. "Physical" and "mental" pain alike
are destined to disappear into evolutionary history. The biochemistry
of everyday discontents will be genetically phased out too. Instead,
matter and energy will be sculpted into perpetually life-loving
super-beings. Their states of mind are likely to be incomprehensibly
diverse by comparison with today. Yet all will share at least one
common feature: a sublime and all-pervasive happiness." "States
of "dopamine-overdrive" can actually enhance exploratory and goal-directed
activity. Hyper-dopaminergic states can also increase the range
and diversity of actions an organism finds rewarding. So our descendants
may live in a civilisation of well-motivated "high-achievers", animated
by gradients of bliss. Their productivity may far eclipse our own."
http://www.hedweb.com/hedethic/hedonist.htm
http://www.art.net/
Not necessarily related to genome, but a great link for information
and links to galleries and works of art that include painting and
what not.
http://gdbwww.gdb.org/
A very cool site that lets you actually search for different things
and search by string in the actual human genome project. I find
this very cool because it actually puts the genome project at your
fingertips for perusal.
http://telebody.ws/telekroker.htm
A cool site about transgenic art. Similar to Ed Kac, but with some
more text that really allows you to learn more about this interesting
topic.
http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/isast/spec.projects/art+biobibl
io.html Leonardo bibliography, for info about a ton of books
related to the topics we are studying. I think thses will come in
handy later in the class for our projects.
http://www.asu.edu/it/fyi/insideit/2001/10/article5.html
More information about glow in the dark animals. Im not sure my
stand on the issue, but Its very interesting nevertheless.
http://www.design.iastate.edu/SP_EVENTS/EE/geo.html
More information about George Gessert, extending the work of Mendel
in the current time by using his knowledge of art and his visual
aesthetic, to create totally new creations, that are real.
http://phylogeny.arizona.edu/tree/phylogeny.html
The tree of life. I really don't know how this relates, but its
an interesting online tree of information.
My
fav: http://www.ai.mit.edu/
A whole lab at MIT dedicated to artificial intelligence. I have
a bad feeling they've got nerds burning the midnight oils making
weird creatures that will ultimately lead to the destruction of
the human race.
http://www.acm.org/sigart/
Another repository for artificial intelligence information. Figuring
out how to make things think like us is similar to figuring out
how to actually make us (with cloning and what not), its a little
erie.
http://www.savingsandclone.com/
http://www.d-b.net/dti/
I didn1t even think that this was possible or legal. I didn1t think
would even be considered for a long time. I found it interesting
that this is actually becoming commonplace now or if it was just
a joke site.
http://www.geneart.org/offerings.htm
The painting by Frank Moore called Oz, 2000 was interesting on several
levels. It told his story concerning how he contracted aids and
then took an active part in science. The picture has many elements
to it and was just curious to look at.
http://members.tripod.com/vismath7/proceedings/brodyk.htm
This site is a paper that Andre Brodyk wrote dealing with genomic
art. I actually got an idea of some of the reasons people are interested
in this form of art and what catches people1s attention.
http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/gallery/gallery314/anker.html
This is an interesting piece. In one way it is art and once you
look at it long enough you see chromosomes and the DNA alphabet.
I thought it was pretty how she combined art and science. 5+)
http://www.geneart.org/genome-toc.htm
This
site includes several genomic and science art examples. In addition
there is a lot of reading that for the most part was interesting.
This site has a lot of things that might be useful in trying to
decide what approach to take to the project.
http://www.creativetime.org/dnaid/images/genetic_certificate-large.pdf
I just found this amusing in that who ever thought you would have
to copyright your own DNA, the essence to your personality?
http://www.henryart.org/gene-sis/home.html
This is an advertisement for an art exhibit concerning genetic art.
I liked seeing the images that scrolled across dealing with what
was going to be displayed. I was amazed to see the diversity of
the art projects there. I still am surprised that this topic is
as popular as it is.
http://www.memphis.edu/egypt/
This site is not directly related to science and art. However, I
decided to include it because I was trying to think of something
I could do for the project that would include using Egyptian hieroglyphics
to code for certain letters. It was just a thought.
http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Gene_20Modification_20as_20Art
This page is a forum for people on the internet to discuss gene
modification as art. it is a good source for gauging public opinion/response
to the manipulation of genes as a medium for art.
http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/139/metascape.html
The group metaScape interprets biologically themed material through
music. The choice of instruments, tone and pitch all effect the
artistry of the gene or protein being explored in the song. They
range from dark to trance like and ambient.
http://www.rickguidotti.com/genome.htm
Guidotti stays in his native media, photography, while exploring
the impact of genetics on people suffering from genetic disorders.
However, instead of capturing the genetic disorder on film, his
images seem to downplay the genetic variation, to look more at the
universal beauty of our human genome, sometimes skewed by, sometimes
accentuated by the variation in our genes.
http://www.geneticalliance.org/geneticissues/discrimresources.html
Art has a unique way of showing differences and similarities between
people. The UN sponsored exhibit, "Art Against Racism" [http://www.un.org/WCAR/exhibit.htm],
shows how powerful a statement art can make against discrimination.
The movie GATTACA explored a new world where the dominating form
of discrimination was no longer race or sex, but genetic. This site
is a primer on where we stand on discrimination based on genetics.
http://www.lawgenecentre.org/
-- This is a center that focused on the legal an ethical issue with
gene cloning and genetic engineering. It features articles like
3Banning of cloning human embryo in Kentucky2, and 3Selecting and
transferring spider gene to cows to produce tough fibers from milk2.
These ideas echo with Alexis Rockman1s artwork 3The Farm2 (2000).
http://www.ornl.gov/hgmis/publicat/genechoice/index.html
-- MOST INTERESTING -- An online book 3Your Genes, Your Choices2.
Using some case studies or examples, the author tries to explain
genetic concepts in the language of the general public. It also
raises some ethical questions and possible implications associated
with medical genetic researches. I really like the case studies
idea, which make the genetic concepts more applicable to everyday1s
lives.
http://www.geneart.org/genome-toc.htm
-- Using works by artists introduced in our class as illustrations,
including Alexis Rockman, Eduardo Kac, this is another online book
that talks about the implications of genetic researches, but emphasizing
on impacts on different areas of the society.
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/srtscot/genthpy1.htm#Manip
Questions about the implications of genetic engineering and germline/somatic
cell gene therapy. These are from the point of view of the Church
of Scotland, United Kingdom, a country that has banned germline
gene therapy.
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,36288,00.html
This is article about a Chicago Art Expo 2000, where an artist
created a piece of work with two cryogenic sperm banks containing
sex-selected sperm samples kept healthy by liquid nitrogen. Other
artworks have similar topics as the Paradise Now exhibition. These
artworks show how creative artists can be in terms of expressing
their concerns about genetic researches.
http://www.henryart.org/gene-sis/new_works.html
-- Essays and drawings exploring Human Genetics. The best part about
this website is that the long accompanying texts explains or relates
to the concepts expressed in the artworks in that page, which clarify
the artists1 intentions a lot.
http://www.shef.ac.uk/~psysc/rmy/sac.html
-- Online articles about the application of science to culture and
everyday lives. Of particular interest is an article about an old
but still existing Mormon belief that inbreeding will produce more
elites (Which is in many cases, turn out to bring two rare recessive
copies of the genes together and case genetic disorder).
http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/sci_cult/
-- Articles on the splitting and overlapping of the world of science
and the world of culture. Also features some scientific articles
that may link the two worlds together.
http://www.molecularmusic.com/musicoftheplants.htm
-- Molecular music site featuring music created from the sequences,
secondary and tertiary structures of plant proteins.
http://www.whozoo.org/mac/Music/Sources.htm
-- Some very interesting research findings on molecular music, including
the finding that converting the DNA sequences to music helped to
make remembering and recognizing specific DNA patterns easier, and
the proposal that the meaning of proteins and of music springs from
a similar origin -- the repetition and elaboration of thematic sequences
(Intersection of art and science). Most Interesting Site
http://www.intlplasticsurg.com/
-There is no other perfect combination of art and science in the
field of medicine than plastic surgery. This is the ability of a
surgeon who is a scientific doctor of medicine being able to reshape
parts of the body to make them more pleasing for aesthetic purposes.
Very interesting site Interesting Sites
http://www.cherrydelosreyes.com/future_index.html
-A website to bridge the future of art and science. Linked off of
a site designed by an artist who is a practicing physician also
-Goal is to show a diverse group of artwork focused on being open
http://www.artscienceresearchlab.org/nav/who1f.htm
-Very interesting website with the very specific goal of providing
cross disciplinary research in art and science combined -Presenters
attempt to make distinctions between cultural and scientific boundaries
http://www.science-art.com/Join/JTC_YAOL1.html
-A link for artists to display artwork that is a cross with the
sciences. Also shows medical-art.com which is a cross of medicine
and art http://library.thinkquest.org/3257/principles.html#optics
-In the 16001s and 17001s science focused greatly on the physics
of life. This included optics, illusions, and scientific techniques.
-This website is able to mix art from this period with scientific
principles under investigation at the time
http://www.5points.com/exhibits/egleston/eglestoncolor.htm
-A collaboration between scientists and artists to create new images
-Art focuses on geometric images used in science combined with traditional
medias to create art with a scientific twist
http://www.art-and-science.com/
-Can a scientist gain insight into research through a subjuctive
expression of the mind? Can an artist be inspired by new technology
from the sciences? These are questions that this website addresses.
-Provided by L1Oreal makeup and cosmetic company as a way to provide
health and beauty to the world
http://www.mathmuseum.org/Fractal.htm
Most interesting ideas to me:
http://www.accad.ohio-state.edu/~rinaldo/works/augmented/index.html
This site displays how a fish could interact with its environment
outside its fishbowl! I had never heard of such a thing or ever
imagined something like this in my wildest dreams. I think it would
be amazing to come home from a class and find my fishbowl in front
of the television or sitting on my porch!
http://www.geneart.org/offerings.htm
The work under the year 2000 by Eva Sutton entitled Hybrids is a
really entertaining link. It opens to a window where you can change
parts of the animal to create a hybrid. I enjoyed playing around
with this site. It was crazy to see what new and strange animals
could be made by substituting part of one animal for another.
http://www.henryart.org/gene-sis/artists_creativetime.html
This site contains amusing paper cups that have been created poking
fun at the whole concept of having a complete map of our DNA sequence.
The cartoons printed on the cups are very amusing yet make you think
about whether this is a good idea or not. Will we be able to soon
design our own baby, or clone one another? Will we someday have
to copyright our own genes to protect ourselves from being cloned?
These thought provoking questions were raised through this simple
comic matter.
http://www.asci.org/LSC~solar/fireflies.html
This site has a really remarkable piece of artwork as décor, which
could only have been possible by using scientific knowledge to create
it. I think it is beautiful and so inventive! I have never seen
anything like it before and would love to see it in person. It is
even more impressive in person I would imagine.
http://asci.org/digital2000/Files/DigitalPrints/aklein.html
I find the piece Dodecahedron - Universe / Divinity to be very appealing
and creative. It reminds me of when I used to play connect the dots
as a kid, only more complex. It is interesting to see a picture
of something we see every night, the sky and stars, to be superimposed
with this mathematical shape onto it.
http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/genomics/0_home/index.html
This is the description of an exhibit at the American Museum
of Natural History. The link Art Installation takes you to a site
that shows how this one artist has contributed to the exhibit by
making a video connecting the two fields, art and genetics. I was
astounded to see that this topic was a major exhibit at this museum.
It is incredible to see how popular of a subject this has become
in the last few years as we learn more about the human genome.
http://www.asci.org/digital2001/sidal/sidal.htm
This picture I added to this list because I honestly didn1t know
exactly what to make of it. The fact that it has a highly secretive
encoding reminds me the encoding of our DNA that is highly organized
and complicated. The fact that the artist didn1t even see the original
picture is curious as well. I thought it was unusual how I just
stared at this picture for awhile, trying to figure it out with
no success.
http://www.asci.org/digital2001/heller/heller.htm
I originally thought that this was an attractive picture to look
at even before I knew what it was. After I learned that it was different
paths of electrons, I was intrigued. Since I am interested in chemistry
I thought it was fascinating to read the passage and be able to
follow the paths of these electrons in the picture. The second picture
looked like waves to begin with and the bright colors make it a
beautiful picture. It was remarkable how these pictures were created
using science, yet look like art.
http://www.geneart.org/portraiture.htm
This page shows several more examples of genomic art. However, the
picture series The Garden of Delights consisting of the piece Robert,
Kelly and Lydia by Inigo Manglano-Ovalle shows an artistic view
of DNA. I am fascinated by the whole concept of DNA, and am impressed
to see that common scientific based pictures from lab experiments
can be turned into art. I had never seen such an exhibit before,
nor knew that one even existed.
http://www.asci.org/digital2001/malin/malin.htm
These computer altered pictures are just interesting to look at
because it is an almost abstract way of looking at the pictures
in my biology books. I recognized the pictures as skin and blood,
yet there is something about the creative sense of the picture that
makes it worth while to look at. I thought it was an interesting
new way of viewing something that I am used to seeing in books.
http://www.nancyburson.com/
Artist whose major work is about how there's no gene for race.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/egg/205/burson/index.html
Human Race machine. Most interesting ideas to me:
http://www.malepregnancy.com/#
This website is unbelievable. I did not think that a male pregnancy
was possible. However, when I looked more into the site, I began
to believe that maybe this website is real because it was so scientific.
There was coverage of a lot of information on this pregnant man.
There were various pictures and articles on this story. However,
even though the site does not say that this is a hoax. I've come
to believe that it is because I went to Time and cnn.com to find
the various articles, but they did not appear. I guess this is a
form of art work that is truly amazing for a man to come up with
this idea with complete detail. Could there be a time in the future
when males can become pregnant? This is hard to believe, but I remember
someone telling me that it would be impossible because males don't
have the necessary organs. Interesting ideas:
http://www.genochoice.com/
This site was very interesting. This site may be true for the future
to come. On this site, we are able to create a child by selecting
various genes to create a unique child of our choice. With the new
technology that we are coming up with these days, this site could
actually be our reality. However, many questions arise. Is this
way of making a child ethical? What is the perfect child? Perfection
is in the eye of the beholder.
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0038/berwick.php
We as different races are so similar in many ways. We share 99.9%
of our genetic material and "there's no one gene for race." This
link informs us about the Human Race Machine, which morphs a person
into five different races: Asian, Caucasian, African, eastern Indian,
and Latina. There's a picture of a woman who appears as five different
races; however, the only thing that seems to change in each face
is the hue. I thought that this link was amazing by the fact that
the lady appears to be different races by just changing her hue.
Our society tends to link race by the color of our skin.
http://www.ekac.org/blueyellow.html
~ glowing ball, outer space, "art," non-scientific, beautiful illumination
of colors At first glance, this picture looks like an art representation
of paint splats on a purple-colored circle. However, in actuality,
the spots are fluorescent bacteria. The different colors are created
due to their contact with each other. This picture draws the very
question if science is art. I think this picture can be viewed as
art because art has many forms.
http://www.potatoland.org/p-soup/
~ interactive, art, the images move freely The effects are extremely
impressive. With this art form, I have the ability to control the
designs by adding more circles or lines and choosing the different
colors. What interests me the most about this link is that everything
occurs simultaneously until they individually end to give a final
background design, which is different each time. In the very beginning,
the scene is peaceful. As time passes and I interact with the features
more, chaos occur. Once again, the scene is peaceful when the features
are left alone. The overall design is different each time by small
or large changes.
http://www.geneart.org/crockett.htm
At the first look of the sculpture, it just looks like a mouse.
The figure on this site is the oncomouse. The oncomouse is an example
of transgenic, which is the "practice of transplanting genes from
one species to another." I never knew that scientists have been
performing such research: transgenic. With this new technology,
scientists can further investigate the different effects on "human"
systems without actually using human subjects. This way of research
further helps humans, but doesn't this create mutated animals or
specifically mutated mice?
http://www.superbad.com/
This website endlessly links me to different pages. However, I thought
that it was fun to look at though. Everything I pressed continuously
sent me to a different site. In the end, i'm always directed to
one site, which has a yellow stop light figure in which the whole
effect starts again when I press one of the lights. This art project
can be categorized into interactive art. I was the one who controlled
my own destination through the site. The art on the pages is constantly
moving and is very unique and vivid. The randomness and unusual
effects drew me to select it. It randomness correlates to the genes
that we inherit from our parents.
http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/genomics/0_home/lab.html
This site informs us about a DNA Learning Lab at the American Museum
of Natural History. At this lab, we are able to sequence our own
DNA by using various machines and techniques that are used by researchers.
I thought that this was a neat idea and resource in which people
can learn more about themselves. The sequencing of the Human Genome
Project has been deeply researched and interacted among scientist.
This project simplifies the information to the level that the public
can understand.
http://www.geneart.org/pages/current2.html
~ survival of the fittest, desiring perfection, self-curiosity This
site rises many questions to why we have the initiative and motivation
to decode the human genome. Decoding the human genome brings the
ability to perfect our genes. We are capable of figuring out our
flaws and fixing them in the near future, which goes back to Darwin's
Theory, survival of the fittest.
http://www.criticalcrossings.org/pages/newid-p3.htm
Helen Donis-Keller uses her own picture to produce the artwork entitled
Helen Heads. The various flashing heads are all from the same picture;
however, the different mediums used to express the visual pictures
create images that vary. From this artwork, she explores the "possibilities
of a genetically-inherited identity." This artwork is fascinating
because it shows how something that is the same is so different
by just changing one thing, in this case the medium, but the picture
to create the images are identical. Most interesting ideas to me:
http://www.chemicalgraphics.com/paul/DNA.html#Outdoors
This site was not the most artistic I have ever seen, BUT there
were a few pieces that deserved credit for originalityI liked the
"Rock Climbing" for example. But the "Mapped Word" I thought had
a witty title as well as a subtle theme that we are all the same
in the worldwe all have the same 4 bases in our genome. Interesting
ideas:
http://www.geneculture.org/gallery/zoosemiotics.shtml
There are a few interesting images on this site. My favorite was
the Zoosemiotics one because it plays on the reverse copying that
occurs during replication of DNAthe reflection in the water in reversed
like RNA.
http://www.geneart.org/moore.htm
I wound up at this site by accident. I read a description about
how she got involved in genomic art she has a table herself it's
interesting.
http://www.geneart.org/portraiture.htm
This is really cool, but I'm not sure I get how he did it! This
is a picture of Watson's (Watson and Crick) DNA. He apparently uses
PCR and other imaging techniques to add a new perspective to his
"portraits".
http://www.geneart.org/weare_geno.html
Really interesting pictureI liked the whole "we're all the same
theme". I think genomic art is one of the best ways to portray that.
This also reminded me of the movie GATTACA where the character stretches
his legs b/c his genetics didn't make him tall enough.
http://www.gattaca.com
Just on case someone hasn't seen the movie I was talking about aboveit's
really goodI recommend it especially if you're interested in this
classit's all about how we're gonna use genetic technology in the
future. I personally like the movie poster a lot!!!!!! very interestingjust
in case you missed the subtle point GATTACA is only using the four
bases of DNA ;)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1889119113/qid%3D1011160955/ref%3Dsr%
5F11%5F0%5F1/103-1954612-3241406 This is a book on human cloning
that I am starting to read.it's the link to Amazon in case you're
interestedfull title is "Ethical Issues in Human Cloning" by Michael
C. Brannigan. I'll fill you guys in as I go through the book.
http://www.dnagallery.com/
I got fooled to think this was a genomic art website, but I was
way wrong! turn out DNA here is the abbreviation for some groupBUT
I thought the logo they chose was worth talking about it!! It is
a fish of all animals the one we 'evolved' fromI thought it was
an interesting notion.
http://watson.hgen.pitt.edu/humor/jokes.html
GOOD OLD GENETICS JOKES! I like humorespecially when it can make
boring subjects interesting.
http://www.d-b.net/dti/
Not quite "art" but I thought it's okay to put it at the endI hope
the class can take a look at itinteresting idea Most interesting
ideas to me: Medicine: Art or Science? An article displaying the
roots of medicine and healing as an art; something one had a knack
for. Contrasts to present day medicine as more structured, analytical,
scientificSless creativity. Interesting to think as the broken human
body as a white canvas, waiting for the inspiration of medicine
to fill the void and heal its aches and diseases. Medication, herbs,
vitamins, surgery all are symbolic of individual paints, which
add a different dimension to the portrait.
http://www.integrativemedicinetoday.com/article1001.html
Interesting ideas: Series of evolution/mutations/genetic engineering
as Art. Contains a couple different interesting ideas: The use of
computer algorithims to create/manipulate a form of computer art,
under the principles of genetics. Concepts of transgenic art: genetically
engineering organisms/animals for purposes of beauty/art in my
opinionS very dangerous. There are to many things that we don1t
know we don1t know.
http://arttech.about.com/library/weekly/aa031401f.htm
DNA Electronics. A look into the physical properties of DNA to see
if DNA would make a good conductor. This is nanoscale technology
at its finest. The fact that scientists would even look at DNA in
such a light (heavily mechanical and physical engineering) describes
the extent at which human creativity extends. Manipulating atoms
or DNA to create something from scratch: Nanotechnological Art.
http://www.aip.org/physnews/graphics/html/dnacanyon.html
NanoArt. Different examples of art on the nanoscale: from an
abacus using atoms as beads, to the world1s smallest guitar. Cool
site.
http://arttech.about.com/library/bl_nanoart.htm
Eduaro Kac. Individual with distinct views of the future of transgenic
art. Ideas of dogs illuminated with fluorescence which would glow
hair, as opposed to grow hair. Also talks about some previous genetic
engineering examples I had forgotten about: antibodies and proteins
in animals for human consumption; genetically isolated plants/animals
and their propagation as a species for the benefit of man. Specifically,
he mentions the mythological creature Chimera, which was supposed
to represent the bridge of lion, goat, and serpent these days
we are starting to make our own "chimeras" of creatures with various
genetic traits uncommon to their species.
http://www.ekac.org/transgenic.html
Use of dietary/enhancement supplements to give people an edge. Idea
#1: Dietary supplements are used to control diet, metabolism, athletic
ability, appearance, mental capacity. This site happens to be an
advertisement for 2extreme enhancement products, but I enjoy the
idea of human beauty (our bodies as art) and the ways to manipulate/enhance
them. Idea #2: I also liked the beginning statements and I quote,
"Since we can't do anything about our genes, the two variables that
are most likely to determine your athletic success in any sport
are training and nutrition ." Ahhhh, soon to be a thought of the
past. Soon, we will have unlocked the genetic predispositions to
the ideal healthy and physically fit human traits, from muscle growth
to height and so on. Genetic engineering will become a "pizza parlor"
of life, with different toppings corresponding to different human
traits.
http://www.galaxymall.com/health/increaseenergy/
Frank Moore: Painting of man on bed over ocean with DNA lighthouse
in the distance. My interpretation: water creatures (drugs) have
provided short-term solution to his problem of AIDS-teasing him.
The real truth behind a cure is looming in the background; a beacon
of light representing DNA strand-answer is in our genes.
http://www.geneart.org/offerings.htm
Baby choice: A comical futuristic website of gene probes during
pre-embryonic stages of life. Much like my thoughts above making
babies is more of an artistic touch than a human element of reproduction.
What happens when we make the perfect baby, capable of withstanding
any disease? Progression of human race into extinction: destroying
all natural resources, overpopulating the world, destroying species,
messing with genes which will create new "designer" epidemics.
http://www.genochoice.com/
Future Hospital: neat site of new medical technologies of far future.
It displays the hospital as if it were here in the present. Neat
idea of art: manipulating human life for commercial benefit farfetched
ideas; a farce on genetics.
http://www.rythospital.com/
Nancy Burson: A fascinating point on races: there is no gene
for race. Wow. I had no idea. You would think that there is some
underlying blueprint which identifies physical appearance and attributes.
Maybe some kind of discovery will be found in the future underlining
our miniscule differences.
http://www.rythospital.com/
Most interesting ideas to me:
http://goldennumber.net/index.htm
This is my favorite link of the bunch because it shows how math
is the basis for everything in nature. Fibonacci numbers occur everywhere
in nature. Those numbers can be used to make the golden rectangle
which can make the Fibonacci spiral which can be found in anything
from sea shells to our DNA. Interesting ideas:
http://www.subvertise.org/theme.php?theme=GENETICS
I thought the political commentary against genetic engineering of
crops at this link was interesting.
http://www.artbyhunter.com/artgallery/artstatement.html
Hunter draws a parallel between Art and Science. Scientists find
order in nature, and Artist can communicate order in nature to the
viewer. This is an interesting parallel.
http://www.dialectgallery.com/index.html
This artist shows that although traits are mostly hereditary, unexplainable
mutations can occur. This illustrates the vast mysteries of genetics.
http://www.geneart.org/genome-title.htm
This link was an interesting assortment of political viewpoints
of Genetics being used in society. I also liked how a Genetic art
work complemented each interview.
http://www.geneart.org/offerings.htm
This is a great collection of Genetic Art in the past few years.
http://www.geneart.org/ashbaugh.htm
This artist makes paintings DNA Samples. He makes an interesting
comment that questions "whether art is leading reality or reality
is leading art."
http://www.geneart.org/borland.htm
This work of art shows technology bringing another world alive.
http://www.geneart.org/burson.htm
This work shows how the human race is 99.97% the same. The women
have the same facial features, you only their color is different.
Essentially we are all made of the same things.
http://www.geneart.org/crockett.htm
In response to scientific research that gave a human immune system
to a lab rat, this artist shows a mouse standing up with an almost
human expression. Most interesting ideas to me:
http://www.worthpublishers.com/lehninger3d/index.html
I was able to manipulate these biochem tutorials into even better
artwork (than the DNA tutorial explained at the very bottom) because
there is almost a rainbow of colors provided. The strands and ribbons
options add an interesting aspect (even though they're a little
unrealistic). Only a couple times I had molecules disappear off
the screen but the "mistakes" I made were easy to correct. The names
of the 9 tutorials/canvases sound complicated but an explanation
of their scientific function is provided for anyone who wants to
know. Interesting ideas:
http://gslc.genetics.utah.edu/basic/gel/index.html
This site shows how to make a gel electrophoresis chamber at home
and provides a link to experiments to try. Running DNA down the
gel gives a varying striped pattern, but I liked doing it better
in high school because the agarose background was blue and the bands
turned out dark blue. I always wondered if there are any other colors
that could be used. With a few clicks is shown a way to prepare
a food coloring/sucrose solution for the gel.
http://www.geneart.org/offerings.htm
On the left side is an X-ray diffraction photograph of DNA from
fifty years ago. Back then no one knew what DNA looked like. Rosalind
Franklin made this image, and the shady cross pattern suggested
to Watson and Crick that DNA was shaped like a double helix. However,
she died soon afterwards and did not get a Nobel Prize because they
are not given posthumously. Her work paved the way for all genetic
research.
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~har/GeneticArt.html
Make your own genetic art. A set of 16 blue fractals in a four-by-four
grid is given to start. I could pick any shape and fine tune the
stability and mutation from 0 to 100% and end up with a whole new
set of shapes. The original shape stays the same so it is interesting
to watch the other patterns "evolve" without worrying about the
intricate details.
http://homepage.mac.com/gdudek/photos.html
"The GA (Genetic Art) program uses an evolution-like process
to incrementally improve a drawing. Your good taste plays the role
of natural selection." By accepting or rejecting the computer's
changes to your drawing, you alter the DNA and genes of your molecule.
This program works on any Mac and uses a computer based LOGO language
to be the evolution factor. >From what it looks like, these multicolor
creations can be genetically altered at will. Gregory Dudek created
this game for kids but soon adults got hooked. I might too. (This
would have been my most interesting one except that I have to work
through a few bugs of the game later.)
http://shachi.cochem2.tutkie.tut.ac.jp/Fuller/photo/take2.gif
Mitsutaka Fujita's photograph of bamboo made into the shape of fullerene
molecules by a Japanese artist. On the left is a tubule of some
sort and on the right is one of my favorite molecules, the "soccer
ball molecule" from chemistry class. Actually it is called C60,
and when all 60 of its carbons are connected together, it forms
the exact shape of a soccer ball. http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/activity/act701.html
This "molecule man" reminded me a lot of the flower we got on the
first day of class. I especially liked the shading and resolution.
Each bump is supposed to be a different atom. Zeppenfeld and Eigler
want you to learn that the atoms are smaller than a billionth of
a meter each. I found this off a nanotechnology page and it is a
simplified version of the very very small machines that could be
going into our bodies someday.
http://www.foresight.org/Nanomedicine/Gallery
also. I found two ideas but there are so many links here it is practically
a search engine itself.)
http://www.artscatalyst.org/htm/atomic.htm
James Acord probably seemed crazy when he went to the USSR to find
out about their nuclear capabilitiesŬfor his art. He is the only
person in the world who can privately own and handle radioactive
materials, which he sculpts with. This page is just a starting point
but I'm sure there is more on him somewhere.
http://www.art-tech.org/html/Exhibitions/ExhibitionsFrameSet.html
In a not quite as scientific demonstration, you stand in a control
room 2000 feet away from a hill. By pressing your fingers on the
control panel, microcontrollers respond and send the pattern to
a series of lights up the hill. This pattern gets expressed as orange
lights on a much larger scale and can be changed as quickly as you
can move your hand. I would like to see that in the dark.
http://www.umass.edu/microbio/chime/dna/index.htm
Here is a way to explore DNA in all sorts of ways, including spinning,
zooming, spacefilling, selecting certain colors (atoms), and even
replicating. You can also simplify the structure by erasing or making
it more abstract. This is similar to Rasmol, for anyone who has
taken organic chemistry here. This tutorial is easier and it's possible
to do a lot more on it. Most interesting ideas to me:
http://www.audiogenetics.com/
-- This company produces music by transforming the genetic blueprint
of different herbs, or bio-messages, into 3gensong2, and claims
that it may help the human body. I am shocked that they can make
a business out of this. The idea of making songs out of DNA sequence
is already fascinating; the concept of using DNA sequence of herbs
that are beneficial to human impress me even more. Interesting ideas:
http://www.geneart.org/offerings.htm
--The showcase of representative arts related to genetics in the
past decades, with most art work from the recent 2-3 years. This
is a good summary of the progress of arts in this area.
http://www.duerinck.com/results.html
-- Using STR (Short Tandern Repeats) and other genetic concepts,
the author tries to determine if his surname Duerinck is related
to similar surnames like Durinck, Duering, and Dierick. This is
a very funny way to utilize the genetic concepts.
http://www.algoart.com/dnamusic/
--Using genetic information of proteins to create music; pitch is
determined by amino acid identity and instrumentation is chosen
according to protein folding pattern. What an interesting concept,
but the music itself will sound better without the voice saying
3Cysteine, Glutamine, etc.2
http://www.artbyhunter.com/artgallery/
-- Collection of abstract oil paintings by Hunter O1Reilly, both
an artist and geneticist. Her artworks have a lot of subtle messages
in them and I like the way the artist makes good use of colors.
http://www.ekac.org/gfpbunny.html
-- An example of a piece of transgenic art, a rabbit mutated
in such a way so that it can produce green fluorescent proteins
on its albino skin. In the future, we may be able to produce rabbit
of different color of fluorescent proteins.
http://www.dialectgallery.com/index.html
-- Artworks with topics in genetics, from MaryAnn Miller. Most artworks
are in crayons, and just by looking at the pictures, one can hardly
find relevance to the titles. Her artworks are hard to grasp and
comprehend.
http://www.davidson.edu/administrative/newsevnt/00.09artshow.html
-- Include 3D-models of creatures, paintings and wood and steel
craftwork representing concepts in DNA and proteins. The large scale
artworks are very cool, something different from a flat painting.
http://www.nemeton.com/axis-mutatis/index2.html
-- Some digital artworks depicting microorganisms, and also features
some music related to those microorganisms. A very impressive concept.
http://www.foresight.org/Nanomedicine/Gallery/
-- Colorful digital images of microorganisms and some future medical
challenges. They all look pretty real, but yet imaginative. Most
interesting ideas to me:
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/srtscot/geneng2.htm
I liked this link the best because it discusses the ethics behind
transgenic animals and plants. I am most interested in creating
a new kind of plant--particularly the rose. I want to learn how
to get a transgenic rose for the blue pigment so that we can make
blue roses. Also, I wanted to (if possible) create a rose bush that
can bloom with a variety of colors instead of just one color. Interesting
ideas:
http://www.scinetphotos.com/aaron.html
I thought this was interesting, because we may consider Professor
Cohen or the robot Aaron to be the artist. I would consider the
robot to be a greater work of art than the paintings that the robot
produces. This is similar to the case with the gorilla that learned
how to paint. We can expand the realm of art when we put the creation
of art into the hands of non-humans. I think it would be interesting
if someone tied paint brushes or stamp rollers to mice and let them
run around a canvas. One could even layout a maze-like boundary
so mice could only paint in certain areas of the canvas.
http://www.rickguidotti.com/genome.htm
I think it's wonderful for him to change from the usual models and
cute babies and photograph people we usually don't consider pleasant
to look at. His photographs are totally enjoyable to look at from
the patient and audience's point of view. It shows a different view
of the world, and that'swhat art should do.
http://www.firstaidcafe.co.uk/EnterSite.asp
http://www.firstaidcafe.co.uk/EnterSite.asp
PLEASE READ BELOW BEFORE YOU VISIT THE LINK!! This link has very
gruesome images of people injured on the job, like images of crushed
toes, hands burned by electricity, a person that got their nose
bitten off by a dog, etc. If you don't want to see these things,
then I wouldn't recommend looking at the page. Art isn't restricted
to being beautiful. It can be moving by being horrible and monstrous.
I think artists have a duty to capture reality.
http://www.geneart.org/offerings.htm
I like seeing what other artists have done with science and art.
Their work inspires me to come up with my own pieces of work.
http://dnapatent.com/science/glowplant.html
This page shows one may go about generating glow-in-the-dark plants.
I think it would be interesting if people were able to make the
plants express other genes like for instance, a furry gene. So maybe
someday in the future, we can have furry bushes. People often wrap
a bush in metal wire that is sculpted into animals; instead of green
animals, we can have green animals with tufts of fur.
http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/
Two biological steps after DNA come proteins. Through x-ray crystallography
technology, biochemists have been able to determine the structures
of proteins. Computer modeling has allowed us to generate beautiful
illustrations of each protein chain in colorful 3-D animation. As
in art, there are motifs like helices, pleated sheets, barrels,
and Greek keys that occur within proteins.
http://www.science-art.com/cgi-bin/search.cgi
This page also showcases other artists' work. You can enter search
criteria in the fields to narrow the search to a specific subject
of interest.
http://my.aol.com/news/news_story.psp?type=1&cat=0200&id=0201102235460605
Scientists found a new better, faster way to transfect mice with
genes using viruses.
http://www.et-arts.com/
This guy did some amazing art with computer technology. New media
expands the boundaries of what artists can achieve Most interesting
ideas to me:
http://hrst.mit.edu/hrs/evolution/public/papers/lewontin1974/lewontin_gboec.
html This links to a digital book, where biologist Richard Lewontin
explores the role of genetics in life and evolution. He offers a
skeptical and realistic view of the importance of genetics. Interesting
ideas:
http://www.geneart.org/pn-intro.htm
The Paradise Now site is dedicated to the artistic interpretation
of the genetic revolution. I was interested with the Bradley Rubenstein1s
commentary on the genetic revolution1s impact on art. He notes that
the body is no longer the subject, only "an object to be monitored."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/Entrez/This
site presents the human genome from the perspective of the scientist.
It is structured to allow the geneticist or biologist to find genes
or compare genes. I think that its treatment of the genome is indicative
of the typical scientific perspective of genomics.
http://www.amnh.org/science/genomics/index.html
There isn1t much information in the "art installation" section,
but the website overall is a good primer on genetics. It also appears
that the actual exhibit is highly interactive, where visitors can
have their own DNA sequenced and compared to other people and even
Neanderthals.
http://www.ucsf.edu/jan/sige_zou1/aging%20and%20stress%20index.html
Under the "original data images" section, as well as the "enlarged
figures" on the first page, are a collection of images taken as
data from an experiment tracing differential gene expression over
time. In other words, the pictures are a way to visual how the genomic
identity of a life form is changing with time.
http://www.artbyhunter.com/
The page is written about Hunter O1Reilly and her works dealing
with genetics, viruses and life in the lab. Amongst the works she
displays here is a digital image of Randolfe H. Wicker
http://www.artbyhunter.com/artgallery/randolfewicker.html.
It is a tribute to Wicker, "the world1s first human cloning advocate."
The picture portrays three images of Wicker, representing clones
of himself, each the same genetically, yet each an individual, a
part of "his family."
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,36288,00.html
Wired offers a popular consumer technology magazine1s spin on the
relationship between art and genetics. The article points out some
of the sensitive issues that arise when artists begin to deal with
the new perspectives of the genetics revolution. What happens to
privacy and individuality?
http://www.aec.at/lifescience/
The art category of the magazine section includes a statement by
Eduardo Kac that offers insight into the need to explore the recent
advancements in biology in arts and culture. The articles also feature
the genetic revolution in plants, which is often undermined by images
of Dolly and the like.
http://www.ekac.org/8thday.html
Featuring an article on "The Eighth Day," this site presents the
biobot as art, though I am uncertain about its validity. The article
does not concern itself with the definition of the biobot as transgenic
art, but rather focuses on what the biobot does and what we can
learn from it, which lends itself to more of a scientific endeavor
than an artistic exploration.
http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/gallery/gallery314/
artbio.html Suzanne Anker1s work, Celluar Script, deifies the
genetic code. It is the language of our "Cellular Script," a script
for life and death played by every cell. I think her work conveys
the scientists1 fervor with genes. Most interesting ideas to me:
http://www.geneart.org
-Their purpose is to see and understand that genomics is within
one's self -The goal of this website is to bring visual artists
and scientists together to help each other and others to understand
what's "going on." -The photographic timeline in the progression
of genomic art is interesting. Interesting ideas:
http://www.accad.ohio-state.edu/~rinaldo
-"exploring the confluence and coevolution of organic and technological
culture" -The comparison between living with and the evolving of
technological material -His artwork is based on scientific theories
and balances the delicate world of art and science -His interactive
art meshes human, machine, nature and culture.
http://www.isea.qc.ca/symposium/archives/isea94/pr208.html
-History is an important element of any sort of progression and
this website discusses the history of interface of interactive art.
-The conflicts of interactive art is discussed and is very interesting.
-Interactive art is not an attack against the established art audience.
http://www.humancloning.org
-Human cloning, right or wrong? -Are we "designing" human beings?
-Is this art or are we violating the sanctity of human life? -the
concept of replication vs creation http://jeffline.tju.edu/CWIS/DEPT/CTE
-similar to cloning, designin cells or better known as biological
engineering balances the fine line between art and science -For
example, biologically engineering our offspring is like drawing
a picture of the ideal form of our future children. -right or wrong?
http://science-art.com/#
-art vs science -art and science = ? -what kind of art involves
science (the well-known works of art sold here)
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/7/31/194202.shtml
-Were the cameras a "design" by artists or sciences or technicians?
-Can you call this a work of art or is it Big Brother? -Is technology
surpassing our civil rights?
http://www.mg.co.za/pc/2000/11/2411_corobots.htm
-design or too much technology? -slashing the sanctity of life or
a true miraculous technological breakthrough? -artwork for pure
aesthetic pleasure or is the final goal to replace human companionship?
http://arttech.about.com/library/bl_geis_archives.htm
-20th century's leading scientific artists (Irving Geis) -pioneer
in molecular illustration, etc. -Interesting to think that drawings
of cell structures could be a form of art. -Is anything and everything
art in this world?
http://digimuse.usc.edu/IAM.htm
-If museums are being built online, how aesthetically satisfying
is it to see a work of art online? -Does interactivity art online
help ease the disatisfcation of not being able to touch, feel and
see in person the artwork? -What is better? interactivity or being
able to see a piece of artwork in person? -How far will interactivity
go with a piece of artwork? (considering Virtual Reality already
exists) Most interesting ideas to me:
http://zooland.alife.org/
This is a great site and is one of the largest resources of artificial
life information on the internet. This mainly interests me, because
the creation of artificial life using software or programming allows
us to get a better understanding of how life actually works. Interesting
ideas:
http://www.geneart.org/
I1m sure everyone has this on their list, but this site is obviously
a great tool and encapsulates this class very well. It shows the
true range of this genre and exhibits the possibilities this field
has to offer via a gallery of completed works.
http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/plus/sfg/
A link to info about the human genome. This finally mapped, piece
of data is probably one of the most important string of ones and
zeros in our computers as it completely describes humans using sequences
and patternsSSlightly humbling, yet incredibly interesting
http://davidkremers.caltech.edu/
Here is an artist that represents a true mixture of science and
art. He uses science topics in his art, but also seems to have a
huge scientific and in depth knowledge about all the information
and tools.
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,36288,00.html
Here is a great article Wired published on the up and coming topic
of genetics and how art can use new information and scientific advances
for its own purposes of expression and theme. Artists tend to express
their uneasiness with this topic and feel the need to express this
in their art by referring either metaphorically or literally to
it. Most of the controversy revolves around the HGP (human genome
project).
http://www.alife.org/index.php?page=softlib&context=softlib
Probably my favorite site out of the bunch that is a resource for
storing software programs that exhbit the rules and studies on artificial
life. This includes Cellullar Automata,Evolutionary Dynamics,Genetic
Algorithms,Multi-Agent Simulation Systems,Neural Networks,Simulations.
All of these are very interesting programs and most with the source
code.
http://www.generation5.org/programs.shtml#alife
More information about software programs and writing your own programs
for creating and understanding more about life. This site has more
information about creating artificial intelligence through the use
of fuzzy logic, but also has a cool section on chaos and fractals,
which I believe to be used in nature constantly.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ljlapre/lparser.htm
This is a great program for creating artificial objects that
uses a distinct grammar and patterning system (similar to real life).
I am currently in the process of programming my own version of this
program, but I1ve only made it to trees. Check out
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ljlapre/gal.htm
for the gallery of images created with this, incredibly interesting
creations are possible.
http://gonzo.media.mit.edu/public/web/
MIT1s silicon biology site that is at the front of the pack of merging
circuitry and boards with actual biological life. I find this very
interesting and scary because it seems were getting closer and closer
to making The Terminator.
http://www.cambrianart.com/Evolve.asp?Firstvisit=1
This website uses genetic algorithms and chaos theory to create
strikingly intricate and creative images. What gets me about his
is that these images arent completely random, they follow a distinct
pattern, yet they1re seed as you might call it and algorithm create
such unexpected results that the images end up being amazing. Most
interesting ideas to me:
http://rhizome.org/artbase/3027/baseball/baseball.html
I thought that this website was the most interesting one that I
found because almost everything seemed to symbolize something about
the situation with the bombing of Afghanistan. To the USA, the bombing
is more like a game. We proudly wave our flags, and cheer the major
players on, and behave normally with no cares, but the game that
we play means that the people of Afghanistan are losing their homes
and their lives. Interesting ideas:
http://www2.evansville.ewdu/drawinglab/
This site showed the importance of the growing technology and how
we can use it to learn. Drawing is just one of the many things that
someone can get a how-to manual on the net. The fact that the site
suggests you can use it as a substitute for drawing from live people
is unreal.
http://www.asci.org/digital2001/lorenz/lorenz.htm
The photographer of these photos seems a little weird to me. In
reading her statement on these photos, I learned that she was fascinated
by the juxtaposition between them. This seems much too morbid to
me. The death of the mouse seems more like a failure in the science
of the genetically engineering of the mice, rather than a piece
of art.
http://www.asci.org/digital2001/arky/arky.htm
Although science is need to take these photographs, is feels more
as though the artist has simply chosen a theme and taken several
photographs. He could have taken his theme further and dealt with
serious issues concerning his subjects.
http://www.asci.org/digital2001/crawford/crawford.htm
I thought this was really interesting because it seemed to me that
the artist was showing how someone could be genetically engineered
(or changed). Whether and internal body part to save a life or simply
a body feature, the human body that nature gave us can now possibly
be changed by science.
http://www2.arnes.si/~dzlata/baltica/maribor.html
This site was weird! What I thought was interesting was that if
you clicked on something once, you were bombarded by all of these
words that had so many implications on life and society and how
they all relate to one another. But, once you discovered that if
you clicked it again and rolled your mouse around that area, you
could see this image of a woman licking another womanıs breast,
which lead you to the idea of beauty.
http://rhizome.org/spiral/index.php3?page=index
This site is kind of confusing, but I kind of liked it because of
the level of interactivity. It took me a while to figure out how
to maneuver though it and once I did, a while to figure out what
it was saying. It was a good idea to incorporate the information
with the dates, and how it was all sent out into the stars as all
of our information is.
http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/ELSI/
Just reading the text on this project cause me to realize, for the
first time, the many ways in which some people may be against the
idea of this project. I consider it to be wonderful for those in
science those whose lives depend on science. It was good to get
a little peak at an opposing thought.
http://www.telefonica.es/fat/vida3/concurso/erinaldo.html
These robotic structures interact with human life and it interested
me that they can give you a sense that "they are observing you."
Something that is not alive cannot "observe" someone, yet somehow
this technology does it.
http://www.telefonica.es/fat/vida3/concurso/efeingold.html
Although this conversation between a robotic head and a human was
completely absurd and made no sense, it was disturbing that one
would want to replace human conversation with that of a lifeless
robot. Hopefully, this technology will not advance too far.
http://online.sfsu.edu/%7Erone/GEessays/gedanger.htm
Yet to decide whether I would like to a do a project about my "designed
child", I found this site about genetic engineering in general when
I searched for designer baby articles. There are many links to articles
and websites here. However this site is on the opposing slant of
the issue.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/Patent/genebabies.cfm
This critique introduces a serious and scary future world of techno-eugenics.
Instead of a GATTACA-like selection of an embryo from two parents,
the suggestion arises of actually inserting genetic traits into
an embryo. For instance, a child could have red hair from a family
of all brown haired (dominant gened) people. So basically human
genes would be manufactured on an assembly line.
http://research.mednet.ucla.edu/pmts/germline/
I followed a link from "websites supporting techno-eugenics" to
find this. However this site presents both sides of the debate and
is meant to inform the public, according to the homepage. A twist
of Monsanto?
http://www.eugenics-watch.com/
Being an introduction to eugenics, this site was useful in finding
other links about the gene manipulation debate. The part about Catholics
was interesting because even though I am Catholic, I don't believe
in their (or the scientific proponents') extreme.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/designer_babies.shtml
A summary of a BBC movie about designer babies. This technology
may exist in the next 20 years (or less), and there is an overview
of the different methods that can be used.
http://research.mednet.ucla.edu/pmts/germline/Evolution%20and%20Genome/ehframes.htm
Artificial evolution sounds like a futuristic concept, but we have
been altering the genomes of generations of organisms in labs. In
humans, though? According to Ennenga, " failing to act upon the
opportunities of germline engineering would condemn our species
to a static role in an otherwise dynamic universe and greatly delimit
our futures. Artificial Evolution will be our method, truly, our
vehicle, into those futures. It will be our way of recognizing,
of honoring, and turning to our wider universe." We might be talking
about this in a few weeks in class.
http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/142/dj_twinspin.html
Music is art too. DJ Twinspin, who is classified under "intelligent
techno", has a lot of songs with scientific names that have great
beats. I listened to songs with catching descriptions and names
this weekend and kept some. The scientific artists/songs on my latest
minidisc are DJ Twinspin ("Bicarbonate") and Realism Zero ("Phenotype"
and "In Vitro"). Search for anything at www.mp3.com
http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/gallery/gallery314/anker.html
"A dynamic sequence of movements allows them to format chains, replicate
and spin apart. DNA is a medium that tolerates no error, no correction."
I thought that this was an important statement about DNA; possibly
one to turn into a DNA sequence using the genetic code for our project.
I also really like this piece of art; there is so much meaning in
this one piece.
http://www.accessexcellence.org/AB/IE/Biotechnologys_Impact.html
This is an article describing the moral issues behind biotechnology.
There is a lot of useful information presented on this page. I found
it interesting about all the social impacts that it has on us.
http://www.ornl.gov/TechResources/Human_Genome/home.html
This is a very detailed website with all the aspects of the Human
Genome Project. Although not art related, it provides some useful
information to grasp the background on the human genome project.
http://www.usatoday.com/life/health/genetics/lhgec085.htm
I thought that this was very interesting and new. Apparently all
the 2000 Olympic merchandise was stained with the DNA of the Australian
athletes in the tags of the merchandise. This way it marks the original
pieces for years to come. This is a new way that the genetic interest
has directly affected us.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/dna-evidence.htm
I found this to be an interesting site about how DNA is used in
the courtroom. It described many of the aspects concerning forensic
evidence. I am hoping to find some way to do a research paper using
a topic like this one.
http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/cloning/cloning.jsp?id=ns99991826
Once again not related to the art side of the class, but an important
article. If this is confirmed it means that we donıt have to use
embryonic cells, once thought to be the only totipotent cells, to
make clones! What a discovery!
http://anzwers.org/free/chimaera/island.html
http://stat-www.berkeley.edu/users/terry/Classes/s260.1998/Week8b/week8b/node3.html
I
was looking at this site to see if any ideas of how I was going
to combine cloning into my DNA project. The topics are detailed
but there is a lot of good information that can be used if anything,
as background information. MOST INTERESTING THIS WEEK:
http://www.toshima.ne.jp/~edogiku/
-- Many multimedia files related to molecular music (Shockwave movies,
Quicktime MIDI files, etc.) The music clips here sound funkier than
the ones in some other molecular music sites, and sound more like
traditional Asian music (probably because of instrument choice in
the music piece). I love the way they have so many pictures and
movies about molecular music
http://www.molecularmusic.com/
-- A simple site that has descriptions about the principles behind
the creation of molecular music (Using the 3D structure and amino
acid sequence information of plant proteins to create music piece),
and also some possible therapeutic functions and benefits of the
music.
http://www.whozoo.org/mac/Music/
-- A molecular music site featuring music made from different proteins.
There are descriptions for each proteinıs function, the complete
sequence of the proteins, and the patterns of the music formed from
them.
http://www.o-art.org/history/Composers/Alexjander/DNA.html
-- An article about the author experimenting with molecular music,
and his feelings during the process.
http://www.composerscientist.com/content/research/NoWalls_BobSturm.pdf
-- A very formal scientific research article about the relationships
about Physics, quantum particles, and sound patterns.
http://www.toddbarton.com/index2.shtml
-- A Web site for Todd Barton, a composer who works with molecular
music. Features clips, interviews, background on the music, etc.
http://www.isea.qc.ca//symposium/archives/abstracts95/abs21.html
-- Another scientific article about using DNA or protein sequence
to create music. Include a brief description of how molecular music
is created from the DNA or amino acid sequence.
http://algoart.com/
-- Algorithmic arts website, showcasing a sequencer, and converter
for DNA/protein information into MIDI music. Also contains some
clips of DNA and protein molecular music.
http://www-ks.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/people/schulz/fmusic/dna.html
-- A bulletin board page that has a large number of responses, from
professionals to amateur in the experimentation with molecular DNA
music.
http://www.healingmusic.org/SusanA/index.html
-- A website of a molecular music composer, including some links
to research and interview articles, and also a basic introduction
to the creation of molecular music.
http://online.sfsu.edu/%7Erone/GEessays/gedanger.htm
Yet to decide whether I would like to a do a project about my "designed
child", I found this site about genetic engineering in general when
I searched for designer baby articles. There are many links to articles
and websites here. However this site is on the opposing slant of
the issue.
http://www.organicconsumers.org/Patent/genebabies.cfm
This critique introduces a serious and scary future world of techno-eugenics.
Instead of a GATTACA-like selection of an embryo from two parents,
the suggestion arises of actually inserting genetic traits into
an embryo. For instance, a child could have red hair from a family
of all brown haired (dominant gened) people. So basically human
genes would be manufactured on an assembly line.
http://research.mednet.ucla.edu/pmts/germline/
I followed a link from "websites supporting techno-eugenics" to
find this. However this site presents both sides of the debate and
is meant to inform the public, according to the homepage. A twist
of Monsanto?
http://www.eugenics-watch.com/
Being an introduction to eugenics, this site was useful in finding
other links about the gene manipulation debate. The part about Catholics
was interesting because even though I am Catholic, I don't believe
in their (or the scientific proponents') extreme.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/designer_babies.shtml
A summary of a BBC movie about designer babies. This technology
may exist in the next 20 years (or less), and there is an overview
of the different methods that can be used.
http://research.mednet.ucla.edu/pmts/germline/Evolution%20and%20Genome/ehframes.htm
Artificial evolution sounds like a futuristic concept, but we have
been altering the genomes of generations of organisms in labs. In
humans, though? According to Ennenga, " failing to act upon the
opportunities of germline engineering would condemn our species
to a static role in an otherwise dynamic universe and greatly delimit
our futures. Artificial Evolution will be our method, truly, our
vehicle, into those futures. It will be our way of recognizing,
of honoring, and turning to our wider universe." We might be talking
about this in a few weeks in class.
http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/142/dj_twinspin.html
Music is art too. DJ Twinspin, who is classified under "intelligent
techno", has a lot of songs with scientific names that have great
beats. I listened to songs with catching descriptions and names
this weekend and kept some. The scientific artists/songs on my latest
minidisc are DJ Twinspin ("Bicarbonate") and Realism Zero ("Phenotype"
and "In Vitro"). Search for anything at www.mp3.com
http://www.tca.uwa.edu.au/ars/arsMainFrames.html
Tissue engineering is a new development in the science field.
In this site, it introduces a new form of art. A group of researchers
is combining science and art. They are using tissue engineering
as a new form of art by making dolls out of tissues.
http://www.mgh.harvard.edu/depts/tissue/index.html
This site discusses the topic of tissue engineering and organ fabrication
and its ongoing projects. The "laboratory is designing and building
new, living tissues and organs for patients," which may be used
for transplantation in the future.
http://www.pittsburgh-tissue.net/about_te/
There is a vast amount of information about tissue engineering.
Tissue engineering techniques and frequently asked questions are
among the different topics that this site covers. Information on
this topic is explained in more detail and with much clarity. In
addition, a glossary is supplied that contains definitions for medical
terms.
http://www.abc.net.au/arts/headspace/triplej/morning/tissue/default.htm
This site offers first hand viewpoints from Oron Catts and Ionat
Zurr as they answer questions from an interview. They are the artists
who use "tissue culture, tissue engineering, biological technologies"
to create art.
http://www.csiro.au/metis/index.html
"Metis show-cases professional artists using scientific images to
reflect on their own world and the interrogations and discoveries
of science. Metis merges the boundaries between the disciplines
and highlights the mutual benefits of collaboration of the arts
and sciences" and exhibits various artists including Oron Catts
and Ionat Zurr.
http://www.healingmusic.org/SusanA/infraredfreq.html
this was an interesting site for me in that it detailed the methods
used to create a musical interpretation of dna. most sites did not
explain how the art was made. the site mentions that we have a much
broader range of aural sensation than visual, but i think it overlooks
the fleeting nature of sound. Images are much more permanent than
sound.
http://www.brooksdesign-ps.com/Code/Html/godna2.htm
this site offered insight into the relationship between dna, mathematics
and asthetics. it shows that some of the basic geometrical rules
associated with beauty are apparent DNA
http://www.dbs.ucdavis.edu/sculpture/
this peice has certain elements i wanted to encorporate into my
sequence project. it incorporates color representation of nucleotides.
i don't like the way it portrays DNA in a linear fashion. i think
for the purposes of Beadle and Delbrück a linear interpretation
of the molecule is practical for ease of reading and writing. For
a sculpture that represents DNA for the sake of representing DNA
as a celebration of research, i think he may have oversimplified.
http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v389/n6648/full/389213a0_fs.html
http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v389/n6648/full/389213a0_fs.html
these articles are something of a follow up on the discussion from
last week's class for anyone interested. Nature evidently has an
ongoing series of discussions regarding the relationship of art
and science.
http://www.henryart.org/gene-sis/artists_creativetime.html
i thought these were fun. i also found the critical issues addressed
on the cups might be worth exploring further. http://www.humancloning.org/help.htm
Comprehensive site about benefits of Human cloning
http://www.szp.swets.nl/szp/journals/cb052139.htm
Christian Bioethics-the Christian theological view
http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/eugenics/
Shows the parallism of eugenics to modern times
http://www.hedweb.com/
The Hedonistic Imperiative- "outlines how genetic engineering and
nanotechnology will abolish suffering in all sentient life." http://www.paradise-engineering.com/
Molecular Bio of Paradise:Genetic engineering and nanotechnology
will abolish suffering in all sentient life and usher in a new era
of higher consciousness and existence.
http://eugenics.home.att.net/
Neo-Eugenics-"The pace of genetic engineering and breeding technologies
will lead to a new human species, with winners and losers in the
coming eugenic and genetics wars."
http://www.nhgri.nih.gov:80/index.html
National Human Genome Research Institute Ethical, Legal and Social
implications of genetics research
http://www.geneletter.org/
GeneLetter- "The Gene Letter is designed to raise the essential
questions that we must ponder and to which we must respond. While
it is written primarily for consumers and primary care providers,
genetic researchers and professionals are invited to participate."
http://www.anth.org/ifgene/
"International Forum of Fenetic Engineering- fgene encourages a
deeper dialogue about genetic engineering by giving special attention
to: the worldviews out of which people approach science and its
application to genetic engineering (biotechnology); the moral and
spiritual implications of genetic engineering."
http://library.advanced.org/27648
Visions of Perfection:"Covers provocative issues regarding genetics,
eugenics, bionics and plastic surgery. The theme is humanity's march
towards perfection in the ethical and scientific dimensions."
http://www.nbb.cornell.edu/neurobio/land/OldStudentProjects/cs490-96to97/stowe/P3D.html
Basic information about l-systems and how to describe natural objects
using patterns and a predefined grammar. This uses turtle geometry
for creating 3d objects.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ljlapre/one
guys fairly high tech l-systems generator. This is more complicated
than ones i am working on, but this is a model to follow.
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ljlapre/gal.htm
A gallery of objects and animals created using a predefined grammar,
and an l-system engine. Objects are created in the program, exported
as pov files and then rendered using povray.
http://www.math.umass.edu/~mconnors/fractal/fractal.html
Information about fractals...very important for finding out how
to use math and patterns for making images that either make sense
(nature or patterns) or look cool (psychedelic grateful dead fractals).
http://projekt.pinknet.cz/fractal/
More fractal projects. The websites that I have chosen below consist
of many cloning as well as the term "designer baby" websites. I
feel that from cloning stems the entire concept of designing oneıs
offspring. This to me is not only a debatable issue ethically, but
can be considered the epitome in the collaboration of art and science.
The latest technology of tampering with oneıs own DNA as well as
the concept of "designing" a human being. Not only is it controversial,
but the line between art and science blurs to the point where one
can ask what is science and what is art.
http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/cloning
This website has much of the latest information on cloning on how
it changes our lives. "Designer babies" stem from the idea of cloning
so I felt that including a webpage on the updated news about cloning
would be important. I have a lot of interest in this issue both
scientifically and ethically, which is why I included this as one
of my websites.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/designer_babies.shtml
"Pure Science, Sheer Drama." That is what this website says at the
top. As much as designer babies are pure science, they are pure
design, pure art. Yet, sheer drama is the only way to describe the
controversial argument that has come up ever science the beginning
of this topic. This website describes the scientific process in
how the designer babies are made as well as archives of past information
and bulletins where you can discuss with other people about this
fascinating yet controversial idea.
http://www.tecsoc.org/biotech/focusbabies.htm
Another website that discusses the possibilities of designer babies
but with another side to it. A look from what the designer baby
would feel after it is born. Quite an interesting argument when
thinking about the ethics of this issue.
http://www.genochoice.com/
This website was already shown in class, but this was what made
me rethink the topic for my paper and I feel that this could be
a possibility in the near future for all of us. I was inspired over
the weekend to change my projectI still love the human body, but
I felt a bit more creative with this new mediumso I went with it!
I'll talk about it in classit uses dice.
http://pc65.frontier.osrhe.edu/hs/science/bgene.htm
I have found the "probability" aspect of genetics to be a bit complicated
at timesthis site was useful in brushing up on my statisticsit can
be useful to you guys that haven't had genetics yet
http://www.clubcalves.com/semenselectgenetics.htm
oh man! this site had nothing to do with my project, but it was
just too funny!! You can click on a bull's picture/file and read
about it to order his sperm! funny.
http://ep.llnl.gov/bep/math/11/sPro.doc
more info on the statistics of geneticsmay be useful for some of
youI'm interested in more formulas to display in my final paper
http://www.edvotek.com/manipulatives/1502.html
these people I guess had a similar idea to mebut mine is still different!
I will research this site for more tid-bits for the final and use
them more as reference and pictures.
http://www.txtwriter.com/Onscience/Articles/humanclones.html
more reference articles for me to use for the paper...I liked some
of the quotesinteresting articleread it if you have timespecific
to clones and their rights.
http://www.etiskraad.dk/publikationer/genethics/kap02_5.htm
againarticle with interesting quotesprobably not gonna help
most of yousorry
http://www.cx.yn.cninfo.net/edu/science/flecture-1.htm
This page has exactly what I need: the background of scientific
efforts made on creating blue roses and some direction for me to
get my research started. However, it also contains bad news for
me. As I feared, there's already a genetic company, Florigene, that
has been working on this project for a while now. Maybe I should
try to get an internship there for this summer..
http://webhome.idirect.com/~roseboy/homepage.htm
This man shares my interest in creating hybrid roses. However he
uses the slower, more traditional way of crossing roses by natural
genetic recombination. I'm looking for a faster technique so I dont
have to wait 30 years to produce the roses I want.
http://www.michaelsrose.comYou
can see a few of many, many commercially available roses that have
their own name and everything.
http://www.timelessroses.com/howblue.htm
Someone else thinks blue roses are cool! And they mention a geneticist!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jchristensen/list.html
This guy has bred even more roses than the last guy. Purple seems
like a natural color in roses; I don't see why blue isn't a natural
rose pigment.
http://www.rose-2002.org/colors.html
This site has a list of roses with "bluish" pigments, of which are
not remotely close to any colors we consider blue.
http://www.uncommongarden.com/r/browse.html
I can see the huge potential market for a hybrid blue rose.
http://w3.goodnews.net/~kkrugh/rose/random_thoughts.htm
As the link states, these are a few thoughts one person had about
genetically engineering blue roses. Besides the environmental and
industrial impact an engineered plant would have on society, those
of us who are religious also have to consider the pre-ordained laws
of nature. What are the consequences of manipulating genes for the
sake of beauty?
http://www.dnamusic.com/
-- Doesnıt seem exactly a site that use DNA sequences to make music,
but take advantage of the concept that there are underlying patterns
or mathematical orders behind music. The music on this site is engineered
to facilitate brain functions
http://www-ks.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/people/schulz/fmusic/
-- A site on fractal music, music made by applying a certain algorithm
to process the previous music notes to generate new ones. Feature
some pretty unusual music clips.
http://reglos.de/musinum//
-- They allow people to download a free software call MusiNum, which
can generate music from numbers entered by the users, using the
number-theory and certain mathematical algorithms.
http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/9349/
The name of the website is "The Sound of Mathematics", which directly
implies what the site is about. Using numbers and patterns to create
music, the composer made pieces such as "Pascalıs Triangle", "Permutations",
and "The Ramanujan Number".
http://www2.vo.lu/homepages/armand/music/music.htm
-- A site that employs the concept of prime numbers into creating
music. The site has a description and conversion table on how music
notes are generated from the set of prime numbers
http://www.ekac.org/dnamusic.html
-- Yet another site that uses DNA sequences to generate music. Specifically,
the composer generated music from DNA sequences of viruses like
measles, rubella, HIV, and also of the human blood and liver cells.
http://www.artic.edu/~pgena/docs/gena-strom-DNA.pdf
-- A Scientific Research Article that has an in depth description
about the genetic codes, the amino acid properties, and the generation
of pitch, frequency, and duration of music notes from the combinations
of these properties. MOST INTERESTING:
http://www.dnamusic.co.uk/
-- A site for DNA music fanatics. The site is very colorful, and
contains reviews and critics of music by different composers; each
has chosen their own subject and style. Whatıs so special about
these music is that they are not just music straightly translated
from the DNA sequences of virus or plants. They are DNA music with
a twist, and are used as tools by artists for emotional expressions.
http://www.fractal-vibes.com/
-- A pretty well designed site with galleries of fractal music,
and the authorıs opinions about fractal music. The music on this
site, just like many other fractal pieces, sound very "unique" to
most people.
http://www.discovery.com/stories/technology/fractals/fractals.html
-- An online session on the discovery channelıs web site about fractal
music, the representative composers, and the creative process involved.
http://research.mednet.ucla.edu/pmts/germline
I think this was the best site I looked at concerning the whole
issue of the idea of designer babies. I was sold on the idea of
doing my paper on this topic after looking at the many opinions
people had concerning this issue. I am really interested in the
ethics and the whole science background concerning this extraordinary
idea.
http://www.artbyhunter.com/artgallery/stemcellresearch.html
The piece entitled: "The Creation of Organs: Stem-Cell Research"
shows the current debate concerning stem cell research. I thought
that it was depicted in a very interesting way. I am very interested
in the issue of stem cell research and just found this interesting.
Maybe could use as an image in the final paper dealing with the
designer baby concepts?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/designer_babies.shtml
This describes a documentary that will be shown about the possibility
of having designer babies in the future. I wish I could see it but
the site provides a lot of information about the issue and may have
it available later.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4216584,00.html
This site answers a couple questions concerning the issues of choosing
the sex of your child. This practice has already been used in England.
This provides a good example for the idea of designer babies for
the final paper.
http://www.genewatch.org/HumanGen/default.htm
This site discusses what a biobank is, has a comprehensive glossary
and has reports on many issues concerning our genes. This provides
some insight to related issues of being able to us our genes in
our favor.
http://society.guardian.co.uk/health/story/0,7890,617961,00.html
Just recently in England it looks like the future of designer babies
is closer than I had thought. Apparently the human fertilization
and embryology authority decided to allow this practice on a case
by case basis. Provides great points and an example for a paper
discussing designer babies.
http://www.globalchange.com/designer.htm
This is a great site with an abundance of information answering
many questions relating to designer babies. Definitely a good source
for the paper!
http://www.salon.com/letters/daily/2000/10/16/bone_marrow/
Yet another article concerning the issue of designer babies. Since
this is a recent article there is a lot of recent news to take into
account for the paper.
http://www.cwfa.org/library/life/2001-10-12_ivf.shtml
This article will be a good addition to my sources for my paper.
It describes the relationship and effects of sex selection to the
idea of designer babies.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/584767.asp?cp1=1#BODY
This website shows that designer babies are not too far from being
created. Already, they have started designing embryos so that it
can be disease free. This is thinking in terms of the baby, however,
the question of ethics comes into view. As the article states, the
boundaries for designing babies needs to be set soon. As of now,
there are no boundaries regarding how far we, as humans, can tamper
with life and what is actually science and what is art.
http://www.cryo-cell.it/stemcells_worldwide.html
This is a worldwide website that updates the public on the status
of different projects that are taking place around the world. There
are reports from the BBC, Times, the UK and etc. What is helping
and what is too much? PS> hi people in my class.. can you guys help
me out? i think this topic is sort of getting boring...well.. I
could use this because I am interested in it somewhat, but I'm trying
to think of some better ideas.. any ideas that you guys aren't using,
do you mind sharing with me please? thanx!
http://inst.augie.edu/~ambowden/page2.html
This is just basic info about DNA to help structure the project.
It just describes what DNA is composed of and how the patterning
works to create an actual form
http://cat.nyu.edu/natalie/OneTree/OneTreeDescription.html
Rather than having a computer generated artificial life tree, you
can have a real one. There are also tons of links to stuff that
is related to this class and the project at hand
http://www.cs.utk.edu/~mclennan/alife.html
A good definition of artifical life. This info is very helpful for
creating simulated natural systems.
http://www.webslave.dircon.co.uk/alife/chaos.html
Wow this site is great! Tons of info about evolution, artificial
life, cellular automata, chaos theory. My project pertains to the
L-Systems portions and this is a great resource.
http://slashdot.org/articles/01/01/30/2353208.shtml
This response page to the idea of genetic cloning is really interesting
and although it did not have a lot of pretty artwork, it was definitely
the best attention-getter that I have found all quarter. It also
would be a good article to provoke fights between opposing views
on the topic. Some of the peopleıs ideas are really drastic and
they make really good points. These people bash the ideas of those
against human cloning in very clever ways.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_590000/590919.stm
Most of this I had already heard, however it was still a good article
with some quotable lines.
http://www.natcath.com/NCR_Online/archives/102299/102299j.htm
Although, I did not agree with this article, I did feel that it
was important to my paper topic. Knowing all of the opposing views
is necessary to put up a good argument.
http://www.genochoice.com/
This was funny because I could not tell if the website was real
or just a joke. At first I thought it was real, but then felt the
opposite. Yet, I do believe that in the near future, websites will
look like this when people are looking to create their own baby.
http://www.gospelcom.net/apologeticsindex/news1/an010822-01.html
A very interesting example of what people can do to babies. There
are good arguments for and against it. What made me want to read
it, was that the fatherıs intentions were so good, as he was doing
it only because he loved his soon so much.
http://www.humancloning.org/scarlet.htm
http://www.humancloning.org/wantsclo.htm
These websites are similar pleas that I thought people should take
into consideration. For some people, human cloning might be the
only way to go. They are not doing any harm to the world.
http://www.notochord.org/work/sonata/sonata.html
In cerebral sonata, the first human encephalogram ever recorded,
along with sample EEGs, are played by classical synthesized instruments.
Artist: Gail Wight. Artist Statement: "The intersection of art and
neurology, theories of memory, mental illness and cognition form
the groundwork for my thoughts. How much of the body is brain? In
what ways do we resemble worms? What thoughts am I unable to express
because my language doesn't acknowledge them? To what extent do
complex dynamics shape our ideas? Is a machine more or less reliable
due to its lack of endorphins, emotions, and opiate addictions?
What does compassion look like at the neuroanatomical level? These
are the sorts of questions that infect my thoughts, expressed in
installation, computer, text, and performance work."
http://www.geneart.org/offerings.htm.
please see Nancy Kedersha pop up window. Nancy Kedersha is first
and most a scientist who uses techniques that traditionally are
seen as art (staining and applying color to subjects) to support
her work. She perfected a technique of staining and photographing
cells in order to reveal their inner structures and organization,
which began her collection of "bio art" images.
http://www.geneletter.org/10-02-00/features/artandgenetics.html
This is an article I found in the process of looking for scientific
art. The questions that poses are the expected ones but still necessary
for a complete discussion about genetics evolution. Unfortunately,
the link to the exhibition site is not very helpful, although it
has a very intriguing flash loading page.
http://www.artbyhunter.com/artgallery/virusesarebeautiful.html
One can navigate through the vast body of genetic/scientific art
of Dr. Hunter OıReilly for hours and enjoy every minute of it. I
selected this one out of the group not for being the best, but for
being the most extraordinary one in concept. Itıs about the beauty
of viruses, some of them kill humans, which is almost the same than
representing the beauty of death. She describes them as being visually
stunning and yet intellectually horrifying. I don't necessarily
agree with the second part of her statement.
http://www.artbyhunter.com/artgallery/stemcellresearch.html
It was the painting style what it caught my attention of this piece,
a combination of cubist elements with the wild palette of the Matisse.
The scene is symbolic and at the same time representational. Looking
at it, one can make the shape of a heart, or the graphics of the
stem cell. Dr. O"Reillyıs has painted both sides of the issue of
stem cell research. The woman on the far right contemplating the
potential of stem cell research is also looking at and contemplating
the the embryo on the far left that also has the potential to become
a human being.
http://www.dnafiles.org/about/pgm2/topic.html
A thorough exposition of historical data, theories and sociology
of eugenics.
http://www.kcott.com/
Keith Cottingham. He makes "false portraits". Using digital technology
and composition techniques, he manufactures his models, from sketches,
sculpture, computer drawings and other elements. The result is
http://www.mic.atr.co.jp/~christa/WORKS/IMAGES/TRANS_PICTURES/TransplantIcons.html
Krista Sommerer and Laurent Mignonneau. They do all sorts of scientific
art and interactive installations, so anywhere in their site, you'll
find amazing stuff. I chose the TransPlant because combines several
things I'm interested in: 360 degree projection system, and an amazing
interactive concept. Donut miss it!
http://www.azizcucher.net/interiorsHome.html
We all have came across the work of Aziz + Cucher several times
already, but this images are hunting. I love architectural spaces,
structured and naked, and I love photography as well. Both representations
are very successful, even without the conceptual element.
http://www.happynature.com/phlkscien.htm
Dennis Kunkel. He makes tons of money making his microscopic images,
and others. Itıs a fun site although I wouldnıt give him any Novel
Price in any category.
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/beershots/beers/newcastle.html
If you want to see the minimum expression of your favorite beer,
Donıt miss this one!! Itıs also called Molecular Expressions from
the electron microscope.
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/electronmicroscopy/magnify1/index.html
This one is really interesting. Yes, I got a little bit carried
away with this microscopic photography, but there are amazing images
to explore and enjoy. What I like about this one is that it has
a very simple interface and you can zoom in and out, change, focus,
contrast the insects of your choice (as long as you keep your choices
within the pop up menu). Good fun and some interesting close ups
(10000x magnification).
http://www.exchangedlife.com/micro-art.htm
Look at what the Silicon Valley people do when they are bored.
http://www.weintraub.dent.ucla.edu/
This site corresponds to UCLA's center for reconstructive biotechnology.
This site gives further information on my research topic about the
future on tissue engineering: "researchers are convinced that it
will be possible in the not-too-distant future to restore facial
features that have been devastated by birth defects, cancer, or
trauma by regenerating skin, bone, and soft tissue."
http://www.bme.ucla.edu/tissueeng/Faculty%20and%20Research.htm
This site offers more information on tissue engineering. Its focus
is on tissue engineering for maxillofacial rehabilitation. The opening
page offers various links to different researchers and faculty members
with brief descriptions on their studies.
http://www.ibac.org.nz/booklet/growing.html
This site focuses more on stem cells; "further developments in stem
cell culture techniques are likely to pave the way for the growth
of tissues or organs for transplantation and new treatments for
serious illnesses such as Parkinson's, Huntington's, Alzheimer's
and certain types of cancer." It expands upon the topic of tissue
engineering as a method to grow human organs in the future. I'm
not sure if I want to incorporate that into my paper, but it's an
idea.
http://www.usc.edu/dept/biomed/bme490.981/artificial_skin.htm
The site shows a picture of a sheet of skin, which gave me an eerie
feeling-- "In the mid-1970s, scientists discovered a method of culturing
epidermal cells to grow sheets of skin (or, to be exact, sheets
of keratinocytes). In the late 1980s, this technique became commercially
available."
http://www.advancedtissue.com/
This site discusses the use of human cells to develop tissues that
are three dimensional. Advanced Tissue Sciences' technology works
with a variety of living human cell types.
http://www.hum-molgen.de/NewsGen/index.php3
Very recent news from the genetics and molecular biology fronts.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/printablenew/09873.html
Parthenogenesis was accomplished in monkey eggs last weekend, and
here is a basic definition. By stimulating the egg to develop, this
is a possible technique of therapeutic cloning and is not reproductive
at all. There are only one set of chromosomes in the embryo.
http://www.acponline.org/journals/news/feb95/gencoun.htm
This article addresses concerns about genetic testing and what the
work for genetic counselors will be in the future.
http://www.accessexcellence.org/AE/AEC/CC/counseling_background.html
A history of trait discovery and genetic counseling, not as a directive
science like eugenics, trying to engineer the most "well born" children.
http://www.accessexcellence.org/AE/AEPC/NIH/
FAQ's about genetic testing. What intrigues me is when it can be
done in life, for which diseases, and potential effects (denial
of insurance, finding out "new" family history, seeing probability
of disease in a future child, etc.).
http://www.geneart.org/pn-home.htm
-great site discussing genetic revolution. Features articles relating
why the genetic revolution is important in the arts
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/israel/
-allows users to build pedigrees which are lines tracing family
history. I plan to use this for my final and midterm project so
I think it could be helpful
http://www.ebtx.com/
-interesting to think about site. Discusses the tabula rasa which
states humans are born equal, free, and good with a blank slate
for their mind. This contradicts genetics shaping our minds as art
http://www.marlboro.edu/~lmoss/planhome/whatis.html
- excellent website which pairs human and computer interactions
to create a new species. Definitely the most interesting site out
there. Use it to create something cool
http://www.gamegene.com/
- argues that all life exists to plat genetic games. I loved the
site and think it is provoking of thought.
http://www.baylorart.salu.net/
-where is the line drawn between reproducing and creating art. Some
say with super models and such, but genetic tinkering can alter
normal reproductive techniques as we know them to create totally
new human aesthetic beauty
http://gral.ip.rm.cnr.it/
-a group focused on artifical life creation and propogation. The
site uses the technology of robots with human influence to create
such a project
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/Art.asp?li=MNI&ArticleKey=256&page=3
-what if we thought of human life as a work of art and we were simply
the mediums by which it took place? Is there ways we can assist
this "invisible" artist creating us whether it be God or genetics.
Some doctors think so with the use of HGH to inhibit short stature
and many genetic aesthetic deformities.
http://mitpress2.mit.edu/e-journals/Leonardo/isast/spec.projects/art+biobiblio.html
-a great research article specifically relating genetics and art.
Very informative with a lot of references
http://www.geneticalliance.org/pressreleases/artistspr.html
-connecting genes with art. Very cool because music is also incorporated
into this and apparently there was a festival celebrating this recently
last year.
http://www.rosemania.com/Millennium_Roses.htm
Mary Peterson talks about the history of rose breeding and where
breeding should be headed for the new millennium.
http://www.hydroponics.com.au/back_issues/issue33.html
Discusses Florigeneıs breakthrough on blue carnations.
http://www.newhope.com/nutritionsciencenews/NSN_backs/Dec_01/antho.cfm
This article talks about the health benefits of eating antioxidant
flavonoids used in wines and juices. These are the same flavonoids
that are related to delphinidin.
http://www.nal.usda.gov/bic/Biotech_Patents/1994patents/05349125.html
Some people who put a patent on the sequence that codes for 3',5'-hydroxylase,
the enzyme that is responsible for producing the blue pigment in
roses.
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/1978/Roses/legrice.htm
Talks from an International Rose Conference about unusual rose colors.
http://www.florigene.com.au/web/florigenecomau/florigenecomauhp.nsf/web/index.html
The Florigene company website. (The company that made a blue carnation,
and a blue rose.)
http://www.health.gov.au/ogtr/voluntary/pdfgmac/pr35.pdf
The scientific article for the planned release of the transgenic
blue rose created by Florigene. Website:
http://www.netlink.de/gen/Zeitung/2000/000305a.html
This website was the exact website where the author described and
challenged the audience in ways that I feel are necessary before
going further in designing babies. This form of technology has some
relations to art, yet this topic sparked a curiosity in me because
of the ethics and the questions that arise from following through
with this potential idea. Of course the first idea that comes to
mind is that it will cure diseases and no parent wants their child
to have diseases. However, there are much more complications than
that small benefit. What about the people that cannot afford it?
Will the rich and poor have a further gap even in the pursuit of
excellence as a physically engineered human being? If a parent chose
a gene for a child that the child wished not to have or wanted to
have and the parent did not choose that gene, could a child sue?
These are just the small detailed complications of going ahead with
this "project." Those are beside the point that we are tampering
with the sanctity of life. These are the questions that arose in
my mind as well when I first heard about genetically engineering,
or better known as "designing" offspring. How do we know when to
stop and where will this all end up at? These are some of the ideas
that I would like to research for my paper.
http://www.netlink.de/gen/Zeitung/2000/000305a.html
|